Equilibrium Constant from Electrode Potentials

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on evaluating the equilibrium constant for the formation of the triodide ion (I3-) from iodine (I2) and iodide (I-). A key point is the distinction between standard cell potential (E°) and cell potential (E) at equilibrium, where ΔG equals zero. It clarifies that while ΔG=0 indicates E=0 at equilibrium, E° remains a constant value for the reaction. The Nernst equation is highlighted as the appropriate method for calculating the equilibrium constant, emphasizing that E° does not equal zero at equilibrium. Understanding this distinction is crucial for correctly evaluating the equilibrium constant in electrochemical reactions.
zorro
Messages
1,378
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Evaluate the equilibrium constant for the formation of triodide ion.

I2 + I- ------> I3-

a 298K, if EI2|I-o = 0.6197V and EI3-|I-o=0.5355V

I don't understand one thing - At equilibrium, ΔG=0 so that Eocell=0 (from the equation ΔG=-nfE) but Eocell is not zero for the above reaction. Where is my mistake?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Abdul Quadeer said:
I don't understand one thing - At equilibrium, ΔG=0 so that Eocell=0 (from the equation ΔG=-nfE) but Eocell is not zero for the above reaction. Where is my mistake?
\DeltaGo = -nFEo and \DeltaG = -nFE are two different equations.You are combining them.At equilibrium \DeltaG=0 doesn't
mean that Eo=0 but it means E=0 i.e. electric potential at that time is equal to zero.Eo is constant quantity for any reaction and if it becomes zero the reaction can't proceed.For calculation of equilibrium constant just use the above result in nerst equation ie at equilibrium

E = Eo - (0.059*logQ)/n = 0 [Q= equilibrium constant]
 
Last edited:
Thank you very much.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top