Equilibrium: Final ClBr Concentration 0.15M/L

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hockeystar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibrium
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the final concentration of ClBr in the reaction IBr + Cl2 <-> ClBr + ICl, given a reaction constant K of 4. The initial concentration of each gas is determined to be 0.25 M, leading to an initial reaction quotient Q of 1, which is less than K, indicating the equilibrium will shift to the right. An ICE table is set up to analyze the changes in concentrations, with a correction made to the initial calculations, revealing that x, the amount of reactants that reacted, equals 0.15 mol. The conversation highlights the importance of considering molarity versus moles in equilibrium calculations, noting that for gaseous reactions, the distinction may not significantly affect the outcome. Ultimately, the final concentration of ClBr is confirmed to be 0.15 M.
Hockeystar
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



1 mol of each of the following gases is set up with the reaction K=4

IBr + Cl2 <-> ClBr + ICl

Find the final concentration of ClBr

Homework Equations



k= products/reactants

The Attempt at a Solution



First find Q to be 1 by finding the molarity of each gas to be 1/4 M/L. Q<K Therefore equilibrium must shift to right. Set up ICE table as follows:

4 = (1/4+x)2
--------------------
(1/4-x)2

x= 3.75?

nvm x should be = 0.15. Calculation mistake.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Hockeystar!
Maybe it is easier to thing of the problem the following way: in the beginning you had 1 mol of each gas, then as K=4 some amount of reagents is used up and more of the products are formed.
If x mol IBr and x mol of Cl2 reacted to form more products then at equilibrium the amounts of gases will be these: 1+x mol of ICl and BrCl, and 1-x mol of IBr and Cl2, thus
K=(1+x)^2/(1-x)^2=4, x=0,33 (mol).
 
But I thought when calculating Ksp the products and reactants must be molarity, not moles?
 
Actually it depends on the temperature of the reaction vessel. My assumption was that all the reactants and products are gaseous and thus it wouldn't matter whether you take molarities or quantities, because volumes cross out anyway.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top