Equilibrium in reaction of C2H5CO2H(l) + C3H7OH(l)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the equilibrium reaction between propanoic acid and n-propanol to form n-propyl propanoate and water. Participants analyze the equilibrium constant (Keq) of approximately 3 and how to calculate the moles of reactants and products at equilibrium. There is confusion regarding the role of volume in the calculations, as well as the implications of distillation on the reaction's equilibrium. The relationship between the moles of water collected and the product formed raises questions about the completeness of the distillation process. Overall, the thread emphasizes the need for clarity in the problem statement and careful consideration of the reaction conditions.
Mitchtwitchita
Messages
187
Reaction score
0
C2H5CO2H(l) + C3H7OH(l) ---> C2H5COOC3H7(l) + H2O(l)

18.5 mL propanoic acid are mixed with 19.0 mL n-propanol to produce n-propyl propanoate when heated and distilled.

At room temperature, the equilibrium constant, Keq is approximately 3. Calculate the number of moles of reactants and products expected in the equilibrium mixture of this reaction. (Hint: Let X be the number of moles of each product formed at equilibrium. Substitute into the equilibrium equation using the moles of each reactant and product at equilibrium each divided by the total reaction volume. Leave the equilibrium concentrations as fractions. You can then take the square root of both sides of the equation after canceling like terms, i.e. the volumes.)

Other Data:

Boiling Point of n-propyl propanoate = 122 degrees C
Volume of water collected = 3.31 mL
Weight of product (C2H5COOC3H7) = 7.4846 g

I have no idea of how to start this problem, can anybody give me a push in the right direction please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can give you a push in what I think is the right direction but the question
as stated is not clear to me. From the information given, you can easily
estimate the concentrations of all substances in the mixture at a particular
temperature. i.e. if the mixture were refluxed at some temperature T:
Let n(p) be the number of moles of water at equilibrium at temperature T.
Then the number of moles of ester is also n(p), the number of moles of
acid and alcohol is x(ac) = n(ac) - n(p) and x(al) = n(al) - n(p), where
n(ac) and n(al) are the number of moles of acid and alcohol, repsectively,
that are available (given as 18.5 mL and 19 mL respectively---to compute
the number of moles n(ac) and n(al) you need the density
at room temperature and the molecular weights). Given any temperature T,
you first need to estimate the equilibrium constant at that T, K(T).

d(log K)/d(1/T) = -Delta HoR ,

where "log" is the natural logarithm, Usually, one can assume that the
enthalpy of reaction is constant over the temperature range; if this is
not true, then you must express it as a function of T as well. Then,
obtain n(p) by equating the equilibrium-constant-expression to K(T) and
solving for the one unknown, n(p). That's it.

But maybe I have not interpreted the question properly. First of all,
I don't understand the reference to "volumes" in the hint. There is
no big volume change on reaction, even in the gas phase, so volume should
play a negligible role. Secondly, the question mentions distillation.
Water and n-propyl alcohol both have boiling points near 100 C,
whereas propanoic acid boils at about 141 C. Removal of water would
drive the equilibrium in the direction of products but removal of
alcohol would have the opposite effect.

Finally, the number of moles of water collected is about 2.85 times the
number of moles of product (propyl ester), but these should be equal.
Was the entire mixture distilled? If not, there must be a considerable
amount of product that was not distilled, or there are other reactions
going on that were not mentioned.

I conclude that I have misunderstood the question or have made some
mistake in my rough calculations. Nevertheless, maybe you will get
some idea of how to approach this better, and that would also
constitute a "push".
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top