- 42,843
- 10,509
Right.aang said:differentiation
The discussion revolves around the equilibrium of a stiff rectangular plate resting on two inclined planes, characterized by angles α and β. The problem involves understanding the conditions for static balance and the geometric relationships that arise from the configuration of the plate and the angles involved.
The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their attempts to derive equations based on the geometry of the problem. Some have provided partial equations relating to the forces and moments acting on the plate, while others are seeking clarification on how to proceed with the general case of the problem. There is a mix of approaches being explored, and while some guidance has been offered, no consensus has been reached on a complete solution.
Participants are navigating the constraints of the problem, including the assumptions about frictionless surfaces and the requirement for static balance. There is also a focus on the geometric relationships that must hold true for equilibrium, particularly in cases where the angles do not conform to simpler conditions.
Right.aang said:differentiation
You can differentiate H wrt anything that varies as the plate shifts position. I suggest its angle, theta, as the most convenient.aang said:H=L/2*SINθ+YSINβ.WANT ME TO differentiate.
but H IS NOT ON THE RIGHT SIDE.
WITH RESPECT TO WHAT SHOULD I differentiate.
From where do you get this equilibrium condition? its not ##\sum F=0 or \sum M=0##...haruspex said:Now you need to use the equilibrium condition.
That is, for a small displacement of the plate the mass centre does not ascend or descend. I.e. it is at its highest or lowest point.
Virtual work.Delta2 said:From where do you get this equilibrium condition? its not ##\sum F=0 or \sum M=0##...
For this question at least, it doesn’t seem to me it is something that needs to have been taught. Isn't it evident that if even the slightest displacement of the plate (in some direction) lowers its mass centre then it is not at equilibrium?Delta2 said:As I had suspected, something tells me that @aang hasn't been taught about virtual work . But I might be wrong.
No that doesn't seem so obvious to me but that's my subjective view, most people might find it obvious, I can't tell.haruspex said:For this question at least, it doesn’t seem to me it is something that needs to have been taught. Isn't it evident that if even the slightest displacement of the plate (in some direction) lowers its mass centre then it is not at equilibrium?
Think of it this way... suppose the least displacement to the right lowers the mass centre and so, the derivative being smooth, the least displacement to the left raises the mass centre. So displacing to the left does work, and it can only do that by opposing a force. So there must be a net force on the object to the right.Delta2 said:No that doesn't seem so obvious to me but that's my subjective view, most people might find it obvious, I can't tell.
No, that is incorrect, and there is still a way to go.aang said:H wrt THETA=L/2*COSθ
IS IT CORRECT.
ARE WE NEAR THE SOLUTION
Right. And since we want the extremum of H that derivative is zero.aang said:H wrt THETA=L/2*COSθ+SINβ* x'
You have a sign error in the second equation.aang said:LCOSθ=x'*SINα-y'*SINβ
-LSINθ=x'*COSα-y'*COSβ
HOW MUCH FURTHER.