Equilibrium of Tilting Beam w/ Weight: Why does it Work?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Fabian901
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moments
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the equilibrium of a uniform beam supported by bricks when a weight is attached at one end, leading to a tilting scenario. Participants explore the conditions under which the beam can be considered in equilibrium despite the tilting motion, focusing on concepts from mechanics, particularly Newton's laws and the balance of moments.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how the beam can be in equilibrium if it is tilting, suggesting a lack of understanding of the conditions for equilibrium.
  • Another participant clarifies that the analysis is for the moment just before the beam begins to tilt, where the moments are balanced, thus satisfying Newton's first law.
  • A participant raises the concern about whether the weight at the edge has sufficient downward force to initiate tilting, questioning if an increase in weight is necessary for tilting to occur.
  • Further clarification is provided regarding Newton's first law, emphasizing that a stationary beam remains stationary unless acted upon by an external force, and that the moments can remain balanced while the beam is in motion.
  • One participant expresses understanding after receiving clarification, indicating a shift in their perspective on the mechanics involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit some agreement on the application of Newton's first law and the conditions for equilibrium, but there remains uncertainty regarding the implications of the weight's force and the transition from equilibrium to motion. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the necessity of additional weight for tilting to occur.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the nuances of moments and forces in the context of tilting, but there are unresolved assumptions about the specific conditions under which the beam transitions from equilibrium to motion. The discussion does not clarify the exact thresholds for these transitions.

Fabian901
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Say I have a uniform beam supported by 2 bricks and I attach an object with a certain weight at one end of the beam so it starts tilting. Why is the beam still in equlibrium (sum of moments about one of the bricks is equal to 0) if it is tilting?. I've seen this exercise on youtube and I'm still not understanding it. The link is below if you want to have a look.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the example, the condition being calculated is for the case that the beam is just about to tilt. The moments exactly balance, so Newtons first law applies.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Fabian901
Simon Bridge said:
In the example, the condition being calculated is for the case that the beam is just about to tilt. The moments exactly balance, so Newtons first law applies.
Okay, but does the weight on the edge have enough downward force to actually make it tilt or would I need to increase it? If it does have enough downward force to make it tilt then surely it is just a matter of seconds until the beam starts tilting and therefore the sum of moments would not equal 0.
Would this be correct or am I missing something?
 
What does Newton's first law say?
If the beam is stationary, it remains stationary - if it is in motion, it stays in motion - at a constant (angular) velocity.

Lets say it (in the example) is stationary - then, with the moments exactly balanced the slightest extra moment, for the tiniest fraction of a second, will set it in motion at a constant angular velocity. You can see if the moments remain in balance while tilting by redrawing the picture with the beam tilted at some obvious angle, draw in the forces, and calculate the moments. However, they don't have to be out of balance for the beam to keep tilting.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Fabian901
Simon Bridge said:
What does Newton's first law say?
If the beam is stationary, it remains stationary - if it is in motion, it stays in motion - at a constant (angular) velocity.

Lets say it (in the example) is stationary - then, with the moments exactly balanced the slightest extra moment, for the tiniest fraction of a second, will set it in motion at a constant angular velocity. You can see if the moments remain in balance while tilting by redrawing the picture with the beam tilted at some obvious angle, draw in the forces, and calculate the moments. However, they don't have to be out of balance for the beam to keep tilting.
I see now! Thanks a lot for your help!
 
No worries - the idea that you have to push something for it to move is a hard one to get rid of.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Fabian901

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K