Equilibrium, Torque and Tension

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a truss problem involving two uniform rafters and a horizontal tie rope, with a 500-N load at the apex. The main challenge is incorporating the unknown tension force from the rope into the equilibrium equations. The user attempted to apply torque equations but ended up with a result suggesting zero tension, which is incorrect. Clarification is sought on correctly setting up the equilibrium equations for both rafters, including the hinge force. Understanding the correct application of torque and tension is essential for solving the problem accurately.
zspdztzx
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A truss is made by hinging two uniform, 150-N rafters as depicted in the diagram below. They rest on an essentially frictionless floor and are held together by a horizontal tie rope. A 500-N load is held at their apex. Find the tension in the rope.

nlc4yf.jpg


Homework Equations



τ=lα; Sum (torque CW) + Sum (torque CCW) = 0; Fx+Fy+Fz=0

The Attempt at a Solution



I think I am most confused at how to include the unknown tension force Ft into building the equilibrium equation. I assume the rope exert a tension force on the left rafter (Ft1) and another one at the right rafter (Ft2, equal magnitude as Ft1 but dir reversed). After I include Ft1 and Ft2 into the torque equation (I took the left rafter contact point with the ground as the axis of rotation), almost all the terms canceled out and it left me with something like Ft * something = 0, which, in turn, suggesting my result will be 0, which, is not correct, obviously.

Can someone explains to me what did I do wrong? And, how to solve this problem correctly? Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • 2012-01-15_18-28-47.jpg
    2012-01-15_18-28-47.jpg
    14.9 KB · Views: 867
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Write out the equilibrium quations separately to both rafters, including the force from the hinge at the upper end.

ehild
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top