Equipotential of transmission or telegraph line

AI Thread Summary
In long telegraph or transmission lines, voltage differences can exist along the wire due to wave propagation and reflections, which take time to settle. Equipotentiality implies uniform voltage across a conductor, but in practice, different voltages occur simultaneously, especially in AC systems where inductance affects potential at different points. For example, in a dipole antenna, voltage and current distributions are not uniform, with maximum current at the center and maximum voltage at the ends. The concept of equipotential is a useful approximation in circuits with minimal resistance and slow voltage changes. Ultimately, voltage variations in a conductor are normal and essential for the functioning of devices like radios and TVs.
iVenky
Messages
212
Reaction score
12
Take a telegraph line or transmission line which is long. Now slowly the wave propagates through the wire in the forward direction. In the beginning one end of the wire will have a non-zero voltage while the other end will have zero voltage and it takes some more time to get settled after some reflections. Now the question is how can we have two different voltages in a single copper wire? Equipontential means that the voltage should be same everywhere in a single copper.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
iVenky said:
Equipontential means that the voltage should be same everywhere in a single copper.

At equilibrium.
 
iVenky

You ask “Now the question is how can we have two different voltages in a single copper wire?” I answer that we do have different voltages in a single conductor all the time. If not, radio and TV would not function, among lots of other things.

In a simple dipole antenna, like a TV rabbit-ears the current distribution is roughly sinusoidal. It falls to zero at the end and is at a maximum in the middle. Conversely the voltage is low at the middle and rises to a maximum at the ends. It is generally fed at the centre, at the point where the current is at a maximum and the voltage a minimum.

Equipotential lines are like contour lines on a map which trace lines of equal electric potential or voltage. Please note that it does not apply to a conductor like an antenna or copper wire. See:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/equipot.html

Cheers,
Bobbywhy
 
voltage changes require a finite amount of time to propagate through a conductor. If I apply a voltage to one end of a wire the other end will be at a different potential until the charges have had time to move around and equalize the potential. The principal of equipontential can be used as a good approximation for circuits where resistance, capacitance, inductance, and the physical size of the circuit are small and/or the rate of change of voltage is slow.
 
iVenky said:
T Now the question is how can we have two different voltages in a single copper wire?

Adding to the other excellent responses:

Only if the resistance of the wire is zero or there is no current flowing.

*and*

We are at DC. If we have AC, then the wire has inductance and the two ends of the wire are not the same node in an equivalent circuit.

*and*

We assume zero flight time.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top