Equipotential with Spherical Conductors

AI Thread Summary
In electrostatics, conductors have zero electric field inside, and the surface of a spherical conductor is equipotential. The potential inside a conductor is not necessarily zero unless it is grounded; an ungrounded conductor will have a nonzero potential throughout its surface and interior. While all points on the surface and inside a perfect conductor are equal in potential, the equipotential condition only applies at the surface and does not extend into the surrounding space. As you move away from the surface of the conductor, the electric potential changes. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing electrostatic systems.
calvinjhfeng
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
For electrostatics, I know that conductors have 0 electric field inside. And I know that the surface of a spherical conductor has equipotential, (Maybe this is true for all shape of conductor in equilibrium right? ).

So my question is, is the potential 0 inside a conductor as well?

Is it only equipotential from surface to very far away from the spherical conductor?
The inside and outside of the conductor are not equipotential "equal in potential" ?

Thanks so much for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The electric field is defined as the negative gradient of the electric potential. Because the derivative of a constant is zero, you can always add a constant to the electric potential and still get the same physics, only potential differences matter. To avoid confusion, we typically pick some reference point (the ground) and call the potential at that point zero, and then calculate all other potentials in the system relative to that point. So a grounded conductor has a potential of zero everywhere on its surface and everywhere in its interior. But an ungrounded conductor (higher potential relative to some ground) will have some nonzero potential V everywhere on its surface and everywhere interior. All points on the surface and inside a perfect conductor are equal in potential and define a region we call the equipotential.

The equipotential is only right on the surface of the conductor. As soon as you move away in space from the surface, the potential will change.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top