Equivalent resistance of 2015 points

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the equivalent resistance of a circuit with 2015 points, focusing on the arrangement and connections of resistors. Participants explore various configurations and the implications of symmetry in the circuit.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants consider starting with smaller numbers of points to identify patterns and generalize results. There are discussions about the validity of certain paths and the symmetry of the circuit, particularly regarding the indistinguishability of the 2013 points in the middle.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with various interpretations being explored. Some participants have suggested that symmetry can simplify the problem, while others express confusion about how to apply this concept. There is no explicit consensus on the final approach or solution yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of the problem, including the number of paths and resistances involved. There are mentions of specific resistance values and configurations, but no definitive conclusions have been reached regarding the equivalent resistance.

  • #31
vishnu 73 said:
is it that there is no potential difference across A and B
I assume that your two terminals are the nodes in the upper left and upper right. Yes, since there is no potential difference between A and B (by a symmetry argument), one can remove the direct connection between A and B without modifying the resistance of the network.

With that link removed, one can see that there are exactly three parallel paths. Two of length 2 and one of length 1.

Similarly for any number of nodes greater than 4. Since all of the intermediate nodes are at the same potential, one can remove all of their direct connections to one another without modifying the resistance of the network. One is left with n-1 parallel paths. n-2 of length 2 and one of length 1.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: timetraveller123 and cnh1995
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
i was thinking of that too and i realized that was how you derived your symetry method really smart
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
23K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
24K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
2K