Eric Giler: Wireless Electricity Demo

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

This discussion revolves around the demonstration of wireless electricity presented by Eric Giler. Participants explore the underlying principles of the technology, including the roles of capacitors and resonant circuits, as well as the behavior of magnetic fields in the system. The conversation includes technical explanations, speculative reasoning, and personal interpretations of the concepts involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the purpose of the capacitor in the circuits, suggesting it may prevent actual current flow around the coils.
  • Another participant explains that the capacitor allows the circuits to become self-resonant devices, storing energy in both the magnetic field and the capacitor itself, contrasting this with the operation of a transformer.
  • There is a comparison made to Tesla coils, noting similarities in energy transfer mechanisms and resonant frequency requirements.
  • Speculation arises regarding the alignment of the transmitter and receiver coils, with one participant suggesting that parallel alignment is necessary for effective operation.
  • A participant proposes that the magnetic fields of the coils may align due to magnetic coupling, leading to harmonic resonances and varying phase shifts based on power transfer.
  • Another participant offers a simplified analogy involving vibrating tuning forks to describe the interaction between the transmitter and receiver coils, though they express uncertainty about their interpretation.
  • Some participants discuss the implications of resonance on energy transfer efficiency, emphasizing the importance of matching impedances for effective power transfer.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the mechanisms at play in the wireless electricity demonstration, with no clear consensus reached. Some ideas are supported by multiple participants, while others remain speculative and contested.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge various assumptions and limitations in their reasoning, including the dependence on specific configurations of the coils and the nature of resonant circuits. The discussion reflects a mix of established concepts and personal interpretations, with some mathematical and technical details remaining unresolved.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals exploring concepts in electrical engineering, resonance phenomena, and wireless power transfer technologies.

ResonantW
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
http://www.ted.com/talks/eric_giler_demos_wireless_electricity.html

In this video, I have two questions:

1) Why have a capacitor as part of the two circuits? Is it so no actual current flows around the coils, that's all I could come up with.

2) In the picture he shows of the two conductors joining at resonance, why does the magnetic field of the bottom one point in the same direction as the top (source) coil? Wouldn't we expect them to oppose each other like two bar magnets anti-aligned since Lenz's Law would say the induced electric field points clockwise viewed from above in the bottom coil?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Capacitor in the two resonant circuits makes each into a self-resonant device, capable of storing energy. The energy is stored in the magnetic field when the capacitor is discharging electric field, and in the capacitor when the coil's magnetic field is collapsing. This is different from a transformer because energy is not stored in an ideal transformer.

This design is almost exactly a tesla coil. Tesla coils transfer energy from a tank circuit to a secondary circuit that share a common resonant frequency. The tank has a big capacitance and a small inductance, and the secondary has a tiny capacitance and a big inductance. The sparks are due to the voltage multiplication due to the ratio of turns from the tank inductance to the secondary. In tesla's design, a spark-gap is used on the tank side to initiate ringing by suddenly joining the tank L and C together in parallel through the low resistance plasma of the ark.

In the design on TED, the idea is the same. The turns ratio is different from a tesla coil since the purpose is to power devices that run on 120Vac or 5Vdc, and the power must be harvested in some way. I imagine that they insert a full wave rectifier and regulator for the phones, and an additional transformer coupled to the one for the TV that is rectified and powers an inverter of some kind which makes 120V@60Hz. Modern electronics can make these conversions pretty efficient.

a guess: The fields are in the same direction because the two coils are magnetically coupled, combining to form a single resonant system. A system like that would have harmonic resonances which would represent the two systems oscillating at different phase shifts with respect to each other. I imagine that the phase shift would be dependent on the amount of power transferred, maybe its 0° at zero power transfer and shifts to 180° at maximal power transfer. I can only assume that when the primary coil is energized for the first time, lenz's law will be obeyed and the reverse field will be initiated in the secondary, but as the energy of the secondary grows it becomes energetically favorable for the two fields to be in alignment. This could be where the energy to power the device comes from, the difference in magnetic dipole potential between two aligned fields vs. two misaligned fields. But I don't know, http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/physics/8-03-physics-iii-vibrations-and-waves-fall-2004/video-lectures/lecture-6/.

Its possible that the artists rendering is just for illustrative purposes.
 
Last edited:
I noticed in the video that the transmitter and receiver coils are basically parallel and share an axis. In principal, is this alignment required to make this work?
 
mrspeedybob said:
I noticed in the video that the transmitter and receiver coils are basically parallel and share an axis. In principal, is this alignment required to make this work?

Intuitively I assume yes.
 
Greg-ulate said:
The Capacitor in the two resonant circuits makes each into a self-resonant device, capable of storing energy. The energy is stored in the magnetic field when the capacitor is discharging electric field, and in the capacitor when the coil's magnetic field is collapsing. This is different from a transformer because energy is not stored in an ideal transformer.

This design is almost exactly a tesla coil. Tesla coils transfer energy from a tank circuit to a secondary circuit that share a common resonant frequency. The tank has a big capacitance and a small inductance, and the secondary has a tiny capacitance and a big inductance. The sparks are due to the voltage multiplication due to the ratio of turns from the tank inductance to the secondary. In tesla's design, a spark-gap is used on the tank side to initiate ringing by suddenly joining the tank L and C together in parallel through the low resistance plasma of the ark.

In the design on TED, the idea is the same. The turns ratio is different from a tesla coil since the purpose is to power devices that run on 120Vac or 5Vdc, and the power must be harvested in some way. I imagine that they insert a full wave rectifier and regulator for the phones, and an additional transformer coupled to the one for the TV that is rectified and powers an inverter of some kind which makes 120V@60Hz. Modern electronics can make these conversions pretty efficient.

a guess: The fields are in the same direction because the two coils are magnetically coupled, combining to form a single resonant system. A system like that would have harmonic resonances which would represent the two systems oscillating at different phase shifts with respect to each other. I imagine that the phase shift would be dependent on the amount of power transferred, maybe its 0° at zero power transfer and shifts to 180° at maximal power transfer. I can only assume that when the primary coil is energized for the first time, lenz's law will be obeyed and the reverse field will be initiated in the secondary, but as the energy of the secondary grows it becomes energetically favorable for the two fields to be in alignment. This could be where the energy to power the device comes from, the difference in magnetic dipole potential between two aligned fields vs. two misaligned fields. But I don't know, http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/physics/8-03-physics-iii-vibrations-and-waves-fall-2004/video-lectures/lecture-6/.

Its possible that the artists rendering is just for illustrative purposes.

I think the resonance in question is parallel (high impedance) rather than series (low impedance), which makes the E field across the coil much higher that it would be without the parallel C.

The LC circuit does store ('reactive') energy when it resonates but that energy is not getting from A to B because PD and Currents are largely in phase quadrature. Probably a better way to explain the function of the resonance would be to say that it drastically changes the ratio of the E and H fields in the vicinity of the coils (as suggested above) - that is to say, the Impedance is high. For power to be transferred, there need to be significant in-phase components of E and H. This will be when those two impedances are matched, improving the energy transfer so that more energy goes from coil to coil than is being lost by radiation.
 
Agreed. In the situation I was describing the L and C would be in parallel, just like in a Tesla Coil.
 
I watched the video, and came out with a much simpler idea of how it works. I am an electrician by trade for 25 years now and have an electronics background, so all the resonance inductance and so forth I am familiar with.
I see the ring in the transmitter acting as a resonating rotor in a generator, which causes the receiving Ring to resonate and act as it's own Rotor and vibrates inside it's own coil and thus generate (induce) power. My guess is that ring is magnetic.

Much like a vibrating tuning fork placed near a non vibrating tuning fork will cause the non vibrating fork to vibrate at the same frequency, now make the tuning forks magnetic and place a coil of wire around them.

But it's all just my guess, I really don't know
 
Yeh, The more I thought about my first answer, the less I like it. Nevermind
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
9K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K