Error incurred from approximating fermi surfaces to be a sphere

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the error associated with approximating the Fermi surface as a sphere in k-space, which is suggested to scale as 1/N, where N represents the number of electrons. It is noted that N is typically around 10^23, leading to questions about the derivation of this relationship. The actual shape of the electron-filled region in k-space is described as squarish, particularly in 2D, where the area of the square is approximately 4*Kf^2 and the area of the circle is π*Kf^2. The difference in areas leads to a missing area of Kf^2*(4-π), which is approximately Kf^2. The relationship between Kf^2 and electron density confirms that the error indeed scales with 1/N.
tut_einstein
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
I read somewhere that the error incurred from approximating the Fermi surface to be a sphere in k-space goes as 1/N where N is the number of electrons. So, N is generally of the order 10^23.
I couldn't figure out how they came up with the value. I was trying to say that the actual shape of the region filled with electrons in the k-space will be squarish. If we look at it in 2 dimensions (so Fermi sphere -> Fermi circle), the area of this square region is approximately
4* Kf^2, where Kf is the Fermi wave vector. And the area of the circle is ∏*Kf^2. So we're missing points in the area Kf^2*(4-∏) ≈ KF^2. I don't know how to get 1/N from here.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In 2D- as you correctly pointed out the error is proportional to kf^2 ...

But N is the electron number as you point out.

in 2D at low temperatures

kf = sqrt ( 2 pi N )

that is

kf ^ 2 is proportional to Electron Density ...

Then the error indeed goes as 1/N.
 
Thread 'Unexpected irregular reflection signal from a high-finesse cavity'
I am observing an irregular, aperiodic noise pattern in the reflection signal of a high-finesse optical cavity (finesse ≈ 20,000). The cavity is normally operated using a standard Pound–Drever–Hall (PDH) locking configuration, where an EOM provides phase modulation. The signals shown in the attached figures were recorded with the modulation turned off. Under these conditions, when scanning the laser frequency across a cavity resonance, I expected to observe a simple reflection dip. Instead...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K