Error on a weighing scale due to wrong size

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cloa513
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Error Scale Weighing
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the impact of overhanging objects on weighing scales, specifically when a 15-centimeter rigid plastic piece is placed on a 10-centimeter tray. It concludes that the measurement error is generally zero unless the overhanging part is supported or the weight distribution is uneven. Participants suggest testing various shapes and orientations of objects to assess measurement accuracy. Repeated measurements are recommended to ensure precision in weighing results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of weighing scale mechanics
  • Familiarity with measurement precision techniques
  • Knowledge of material properties, specifically moderately rigid materials
  • Experience with experimental design for testing measurement accuracy
NEXT STEPS
  • Conduct experiments with different object shapes on weighing scales
  • Learn about the effects of weight distribution on measurement accuracy
  • Explore methods for improving precision in weighing measurements
  • Investigate the impact of environmental factors on weighing scale performance
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for laboratory technicians, quality control professionals, and anyone involved in precision measurement and weighing processes.

cloa513
Messages
36
Reaction score
4
If you have say a 15 centimetre long piece of rigid plastic and the weighing scale's tray is only 10 centimetres, what is an estimate of the error that introduces in the measurement assuming the weight is still within normal parameters for the weighing scale. I was wondering what the approximate error in general for moderately rigid materials? It happens now and again at work.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would expect zero, unless the overhanging part is resting on something or the weight distribution is so uneven it's tilting the pan.

What shape are the things you weigh? Can you hold them vertical somehow so they are fully within the pan? For example, if they are rod-shaped they could be placed horizontally across the top of a cup and then nearly-vertically in it. Then you could compare the measured weights with and without an overhang as a test. Remember to repeat each measurement a few times (take everything off the scale and put it back on) to check your precision.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lord Jestocost
Shape of things- plates.
 
Hard for you to test, then. The answer is still zero.
 
cloa513 said:
I was wondering what the approximate error in general for moderately rigid materials?
Experiment with a test item, offset and hanging over the pan in different directions. Then break it up and weigh it in the pan. How much variation do you see?
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibix

Similar threads

Undergrad Child's experiment to weigh air
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
6K
Undergrad Uncertainty in Scale Measurement
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Undergrad Interesting bouyancy theoretical question
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Undergrad Bicycle front tire wobble due to weight on the back of the bike
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Error analysis: propagation of error
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Undergrad Desirable estimator properties...
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Force Field Experiments: Realistic Physics Questions
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Graduate What Happens if a Scale Model of the Sun Weighs as Much as the Real Sun?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Graduate How to calculate Standard Error for unequal sample sizes
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
12K
Undergrad Size Effect on Structural Strength
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K