Escape Velocity of Heated Nitrogen: A Scientific Inquiry

AI Thread Summary
The escape velocity of nitrogen heated to 325 K is a concept that aligns with the general definition of escape velocity, which does not depend on temperature. Instead, the focus should be on the mean velocity of the gas, which can be influenced by temperature. The kinetic theory of gases indicates that nitrogen, being diatomic, has additional degrees of freedom affecting its energy distribution. The Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution describes the range of molecular speeds at a given temperature. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing gas behavior in relation to escape velocity.
willstaruss22
Messages
108
Reaction score
1
What is the escape velocity of nitrogen heated to 325 K?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Same as the escape velocity for anything.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Escape_velocity

What you are usually interested in is if the mean velocity of the gas at some temperature is greater than the escape velocity ... in which case you need the relationship between mean velocity and temperature.

-----------------
aside:
"the escape velocity of the Earth" would be the minimum speed you need to escape the Earth's gravitational field from it's surface.
"the escape velocity of Nitrogen" would be the minimum speed you need to escape a Nitrogen (atom? molecule?)'s gravitational field from it's surface.
But I'm guessing that is not what you mean :)
 
Yes i meant the escape velocity from the surface if molecular nitrogen was heated to 325 K. I would imagine it would be faster because the colder the temperature the lower the escape velocity.
 
Again - the escape velocity does not depend on temperature.
You want to look into the kinetic theory of gasses:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/kinetic/kintem.html
... since Nitrogen is diatomic, there's an extra two degrees of freedom so:KE_{avg}=\frac{5}{2}kT [edit: incorrect - that's all energy ... must be half asleep!]

... a gas at a particular temperature will have a range of speeds - given by the Maxwel-Boltzman distribution.
 
Last edited:
Simon Bridge said:
... since Nitrogen is diatomic, there's an extra two degrees of freedom so:KE_{avg}=\frac{5}{2}kT
The energy corresponding to rotation does not influence the escape, however. It is kinetic, but it does not change the speed of the molecule.

@willstaruss22: I think it would be more useful if you ask all questions about the atmosphere in a single topic.
 
I'd have though that energy going into the rotation would be energy not available for translation?
[edit] Oh wait - I see where I stuffed up <sheepish>
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top