Estimate Damping Coefficient of Car with Hand Bouncing & Dropping

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter zacharoni16
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Damping
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on estimating the damping coefficient of a car using hand bouncing techniques and drop tests. Mechanics can apply hand force to induce harmonic motion and measure the time it takes for the car to return to equilibrium, which directly relates to the damping coefficient. The discussion highlights that car dampers are asymmetrically damped, with less damping during compression to enhance ride quality. Theoretical calculations suggest using a fraction of the initial amplitude, such as 1%, to derive the damping coefficient from observed motion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of harmonic motion and damping principles
  • Familiarity with basic physics equations related to oscillation
  • Knowledge of car suspension systems and damping mechanisms
  • Ability to perform time measurements accurately
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical relationship between damping coefficient and oscillation time
  • Learn about the characteristics of asymmetrical damping in automotive suspensions
  • Explore techniques for measuring amplitude decay in damped systems
  • Investigate the impact of damping on vehicle handling and ride quality
USEFUL FOR

Automotive engineers, mechanics, physics students, and anyone interested in vehicle dynamics and suspension tuning.

zacharoni16
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I was wondering how I can estimate the damping coefficient of my car by doing the hand bouncing the car body and watching the motion of the car?

Mechanics usually bounce the car by applying hand force and watching how the car moves in harmonic motion. Is there a way to estimate the damping coefficient by using this technique?

Or is there another technique like dropping the car a few inches or something to estimate it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The motion of the car is of course (intentionally) overdamped, to keep you from bouncing around forever. How fast it returns to equilibrium depends on the damping coefficient quite directly. So with a bit of math, you could derive a relationship between the damping coefficient and the time it takes, for example, for the amplitude to reach some fraction of the initial amplitude. Then you could easily test this by bouncing the car by hand and measuring this time. Then you can just plug in the time and calculate the damping coefficient. Note that in the theoretical calculation, the damping is exponential so it will never quite reach zero. However, the car quite obviously stops bouncing after two or three periods. This introduces a bit of uncertainty in when you decide which fraction you will take. I guess something like 1% could do, in physics 1/e is a common factor.
 
Car dampers are not symmetrically damped. There is purposely less damping on compression (to allow the wheel to ride sharp bumps and to give a softer ride) than on recovery. The have a flap valve inside which closes some of the holes in the piston on the down stroke.
This makes the 'damping coefficient' a bit less accessible than for a simple damped oscillator.

@CompuChip
The damping has another function. It stops the wheel overshooting when it is thrown upwards by a bump. The wheel-spring combination has a much shorter time constant than the car-spring combination and it is easy to get a resonance with the wheel and tyre. You can get an oscillation, particularly when braking and the wheel can actually leave the road in a series of bounces. It also plays hell with cornering as your traction can be halved. I had a Renault 4 that did this until I replaced one of the rear dampers. Very dramatic but no noticeable affect on the 'ride' as the torsion bar suspension was very soggy anyway.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
9K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K