Estimate the central temperature of the Sun

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around estimating the central temperature of the Sun, focusing on the relationship between luminosity and temperature within the solar structure. Participants are exploring the implications of the luminosity function and its variation with radius.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to integrate temperature and luminosity equations to find the central temperature. Questions arise regarding the constancy of luminosity at different radii and the appropriate functional form of luminosity within the Sun's core.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the nature of luminosity within the Sun, suggesting that it cannot be constant throughout and must vary with radius. There is an ongoing exploration of how to set up the problem correctly, with various interpretations of the luminosity function being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of the solar luminosity provided in the problem statement and how it relates to the functional form of luminosity within the Sun's core and outer regions. The need to estimate the size of the core is also noted as a significant factor in the discussion.

Lengalicious
Messages
162
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


attachment.php?attachmentid=57219&stc=1&d=1364507315.jpg


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I'm only stuck on part b). I make a) to be 3.87E26 W, but it gives that anyway in part b). OK, so here's my attempt:

[tex]\int_{r=0}^{r=R}dT(r)T(r)^3 = -\frac{3L(r)}{16\pi acl_{mfp}}\int_{r=0}^{r=R}dr\frac{1}{r^{2}}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{T(r)^4}{4}|^{r=R}_{r=0} \sim \frac{T(r)^4_{centre}}{4}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{T(r)^4_{centre}}{4}\sim-\frac{3L(r)}{16\pi acl_{mfp}}[-\frac{1}{r}]^{r=R}_{r=0}[/tex]

OK, so am I on the right lines? If so, this is where I get stuck. The last bit of the R.H.S ends up having a 1/0 once evaluated. Any help would be great :). Also I wasn't sure about the L(r). Isn't the luminosity constant at all r? I guess L being a function of r suggests the contrary. :S
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    16.4 KB · Views: 858
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The luminosity can't be constant at all r, because in the core energy is being produced. L(r) is the total power radiated from inside r, so it has to go to zero at r=0. You need to estimate the size of the core and make a guess at the functional form of L(r) inside the core, then you can assume L(r) is constant outside the core.
 
Ok I was initially under the impression that was the solution, but then why would the question supply me with the solar luminosity if I integrate over the functional form?
 
You still need to know the total luminosity, since this normalizes the functional form of L(r). Try setting up the problem and you'll see.
 
ok so after saying [tex]L(r)=4\pi r^2F_\odot[/tex]

[tex]\frac{-T^4_{centre}}{4}=-\frac{3}{16\pi acl_{mfp}}\int_{r=0}^{r=R_\odot}dr\frac{4\pi r^2F_\odot}{r^2}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{-T^4_{centre}}{4}=-\frac{3(4\pi R_\odot F_\odot)}{16\pi acl_{mfp}}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{-T^4_{centre}}{4}=-\frac{3(\frac{L_\odot}{R_\odot})}{16\pi acl_{mfp}}[/tex]

Is this right, or?
 
No. This assumes that L(r) increases steadily from r=0 to r=Rsun. In fact, only a small region in the core of the sun is generating energy, so you should try something like:

L = K * r^2 r < Rcore
L = Lsun Rcore < r < Rsun

You'll need to estimate Rcore, then calculate K, then integrate.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K