Estimate the number of stars with present-day luminosity function

AI Thread Summary
To estimate the number of stars in a 500 pc³ volume with luminosities between 10^-2 and 0.1 Lsun, one can reference recent surveys like Bochanski's, which reports 15.37 million stars in a larger volume. The luminosity function can help in extrapolating the number of stars within the specified luminosity range. While a specific formula for this calculation is not provided, understanding the density of stars in the relevant luminosity range is crucial. The discussion emphasizes the need for accessible mathematical approaches to estimate star counts. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenge of estimating stellar populations in defined luminosity brackets.
2203312
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Folks,

Please don't flame me for this as it is probably already answered somewhere.
How does one estimate the number of stars in a 500pc^3 which have a range of 10^-2 to 0.1 Lsun?

I am not a maths head, so simple answer that would have the formula would be great.

Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
This survey of low mass stars by Bochanski is among the more recent ones - http://arxiv.org/abs/1004.4002. Bochanski reports 15.37 million stars in a volume of 4x4x4 kpc^3 in the range of 0.1 - 0.8 Msolar. That corresponds to a luminosity range of about .003 Lsolar to .458 Lsolar. I'm not aware of any formula for calculating these numbers.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top