Estimating a neutrino mass upper limit from supernova data

AI Thread Summary
Estimating a neutrino mass upper limit from supernova data, particularly from the SN1987A event, involves analyzing the time-energy uncertainty relation. The neutrinos in question were produced over one second and detected 160,000 years later, with a mean energy of 8MeV. To calculate the upper limit, one must account for the production time and the travel time of the neutrinos to Earth. This requires understanding the distance to the supernova and the speed of neutrinos. Ultimately, while a rough estimate can be made, precise calculations necessitate more complex considerations in astrophysics and particle physics.
curious george
Messages
11
Reaction score
1
I'd appreciate it if I could get a little help on this one, I'm confused about how this is done. I know there are numerous papers out there about how to do this based on the SN1987A event that was detected with KII and IMB. The problem in my textbook asks me to make a rough estimate of the neutrino mass based on a simplified version of the data:

Assume that the neutrinos were generated and left the core in a period of one second. A large fraction of the twenty neutrinos detected 160,000 years later were all observed in a period of 2 seconds, with a mean energy of 8MeV.

That's the problem. Here's what (I think) I've figured out:

If the neutrinos were produced INSTANTLY, the difference in their arrival times at the detectors on Earth would allow me to calculate their mass based on the time-energy uncertainty relation, and the energy of the neutrinos as they arrive. Because the neutrinos in this problem are produced over a period of a second, I can only give an upper limit. The main thing stopping me from actually doing this is that I don't know how to account for the time it takes to produce the neutrinos. My second problem is that I don't know how to account for the time that it takes to produce the neutrinos. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Estimating a neutrino mass upper limit from supernova data is a complex and ongoing process in the field of astrophysics. It involves analyzing data from supernovae, particularly the SN1987A event, to determine the upper limit of neutrino masses. This upper limit is important in understanding the fundamental properties of neutrinos and their role in the universe.

One way to estimate the neutrino mass upper limit is by using the time-energy uncertainty relation. This relation states that the uncertainty in the time of an event is inversely proportional to the uncertainty in the energy of the event. In the case of neutrinos, the time of their production and the energy they carry are closely related.

In the problem described, the neutrinos were produced over a period of one second and were detected 160,000 years later. This means that the uncertainty in the time of their production is one second, and the uncertainty in their energy is related to the mean energy of 8MeV.

To calculate the upper limit of the neutrino mass, you would need to account for the time it takes for the neutrinos to be produced. This can be done by considering the distance between the supernova and the Earth, as well as the speed of the neutrinos. You would also need to take into account the time it takes for the neutrinos to travel from the supernova to the detectors on Earth.

Once you have calculated the time of production and the energy of the neutrinos, you can use the time-energy uncertainty relation to estimate the upper limit of the neutrino mass. This would give you a rough estimate, as the actual calculation involves more complex factors such as the neutrino mixing angles and oscillations.

In conclusion, estimating a neutrino mass upper limit from supernova data is a challenging task that requires a deep understanding of astrophysics and particle physics. By considering the time-energy uncertainty relation and accounting for the time of production and travel of the neutrinos, a rough estimate of the upper limit can be obtained. However, further research and analysis are needed to accurately determine the neutrino mass and its implications for our understanding of the universe.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top