Estimating Debye Frequency from Dispersion Curves: What's the Proper Approach?

gomboc
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
This is a short question from an old final exam I'm studying from.

If you're given the graph of the dispersion curves for some material (I attached an example, but pretend the axes have numerical values on them), how would I go about estimating the Debye frequency?

My initial thought was just to approximate it as the maximum frequency on that graph, and although that gives a fairly close result, my professor says it's not quite the right approach.

Please help!

(NB: the lettering in the image stands for transverse optical, longitudinal optical, transverse acoustic, longitudinal acoustic.)
 

Attachments

  • dispersion.jpg
    dispersion.jpg
    7.1 KB · Views: 563
Physics news on Phys.org
The proper approach for estimating the Debye frequency from the given graph is to calculate the average speed of sound in the material. The Debye frequency is then equal to the product of the average speed of sound and the density of the material. To calculate the average speed of sound, you need to find the intersection point between the longitudinal and transverse acoustic curves, and then calculate the average of the two velocities at this intersection point. Once you have these two values, the Debye frequency can be calculated using the formula: Debye frequency = Average speed of sound x density.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top