Estimating discharge at the outflow structure of a lake

AI Thread Summary
A fisheries biologist is exploring how to manage lake levels by adjusting a box cement outlet structure to lower water levels by six inches. The current outlet is controlled by two dam boards, which release too much water when removed entirely. The biologist seeks to understand the pressure behind the lake and the average velocity of water through the outlet opening without using a flow meter. It is noted that pressure is determined by water depth, and velocity can be calculated using Bernoulli's equation, indicating a relationship between water depth and flow rate. Understanding these principles will help estimate discharge for different outlet configurations.
salconflu
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am a fisheries biologist interested in manipulating a lake level by about six inches via a box cement outlet structure on a small lake. The outlet structure is currently governed by two adjacent 5ft by 0.5ft dam boards,which have historically been removed one at a time in the spring and replaced in the fall. However pulling whole boards releases too much water at once so I am trying to figure out whether incrementally lower boards would make a meaningful difference in Q.

As a starting point I am trying to figure out how much pressure is behind the 70 acre lake and what the average velocity (ft/sec) would be across the 2.5 square ft opening without the benefit of a flow meter. Is there a mathematical relationship between the impounded water and the velocity at the outlet? If there is then I could figure out the discharge for different square openings in the outlet structure, ie: cfs = ft/sec* length*width of the opening...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi salconflu! Welcome to PF! :smile:

Pressure depends only on depth, and not on horizontal area …

the pressure from the whole lake is exactly the same as the pressure at the same height in your bath. :wink:

From Bernoulli's equation the velocity is proportional to the square-root of the depth: v2 = 2ρgh.

And obviously the total flow is also proportional to the vertical area of the hole.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Back
Top