Estimating pH for Highest Buffer Capacity from HO2C-C6H4-CO2H & HO2C-C6H4-CO2Na

  • Thread starter Thread starter cloveryeah
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Buffer Ph
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on estimating the pH for the highest buffer capacity of a solution containing phthalic acid and sodium hydrogen phthalate. It highlights the significance of both Ka values in determining the pH, particularly noting that while Ka1 is crucial, Ka2 also plays a role due to the acid's second dissociation. The mixture's equimolar nature typically leads to a pH around the pKa of the acid, which is relevant for buffer capacity. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding approximations in calculations rather than seeking exact values. Ultimately, the conversation underscores the complexity of buffer systems and the need for a nuanced approach to pH estimation.
cloveryeah
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Please post in HW section and please use the HW template.
Ka values of the 1st and 2nd dissociation of phthalic acid (HO2C-C6H4-CO2H) are
given below. Estimate the pH value for highest buffer capacity when a buffer is
prepared from 1:1 mixture of phthalic acid and sodium hydrogen phthalate (HO2CC6H4-
CO2Na) in water?

HO2C-C6H4-CO2H <=> H+ +HO2C-C6H4-CO2- Ka1=1.3X10^-3
HO2C-C6H4-CO2- <=> H+ + -O2C-C6H4-CO2- Ka2=3.1X10^-6

so i m wondering that whether the pH (we want to find when buffer capacity is the highest) is just depends on Ka1...?

or Ka2 is counted also??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What definition of buffer capacity are you expected to use?
 
Here you have an equimolar mixture of an acid and its monobasic salt. What pH does that give normally?

Then you have the complication that the acid has a second dissociation.
At the pH you calculated, how much lf the -CO2-C6H4-CO2- have you got?
Note you are not asked to calculate exactly, only to "estimate". Understanding what approximations you can use and when is an important part of this general subject.
 
Last edited:
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top