Estimating the maximum possible percentage error

  • Thread starter Thread starter benji123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Error Maximum
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around estimating the maximum possible percentage error in the coefficient of rigidity, n, of a wire, defined by the equation n=AL/d^4. The parameters L (length) and d (diameter) are known to within ± 2% of their correct values, prompting participants to explore how to calculate the potential error in n based on these uncertainties.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of partial derivatives to express changes in n with respect to changes in L and d. There is confusion regarding the correct interpretation of relative errors and how to apply them in calculations. Some participants suggest using the relative errors directly, while others question how to proceed without specific values for L and d.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing corrections and clarifications regarding the use of partial derivatives and relative errors. There are multiple interpretations being explored, particularly around how to derive the maximum percentage error in n. Some participants have proposed formulas, while others are seeking further clarification on the steps involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraint that they do not have specific values for L and d, only their relative errors. This has led to questions about how to proceed with the calculations and the implications of the given percentage errors.

benji123
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi all! I am new to the forum, came across it from googling the problem which I had and someone was having difficuilty with a question like this on here! Here's the question I have...

The coefficient of rigidity, n, of a wire of length L and uniform diameter d is given by

n=AL/d^4

If A is a constant and the parameters L and d are known to within ± 2% of their correct values, estimate the maximum possible percentage error in the calculated value of n.

Homework Equations



n=AL/d^4

The Attempt at a Solution



dn = dn/dL x dL + dn/dA x dA

dn = A/d^4 dL + L/d^4 dA

n = A/d^4 x ΔL + L/d^4 x ΔA

n = ΔL/L + ΔA/A

Where do I go from here? Any help will be greatly appreciated :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
benji123 said:

Homework Statement


Hi all! I am new to the forum, came across it from googling the problem which I had and someone was having difficuilty with a question like this on here! Here's the question I have...
Welcome, benji. You have come to a good place for help.
benji123 said:
The coefficient of rigidity, n, of a wire of length L and uniform diameter d is given by

n=AL/d^4

If A is a constant and the parameters L and d are known to within ± 2% of their correct values, estimate the maximum possible percentage error in the calculated value of n.

Homework Equations



n=AL/d^4

The Attempt at a Solution



dn = dn/dL x dL + dn/dA x dA
A is a constant, so dn/dA doesn't make any sense. Instead, you want dn/dd. For the record, dn/dL and dn/dd are really the partial derivatives of n. I.e.,
[tex]\frac{\partial n}{\partial L} \text{and} \frac{\partial n}{\partial d}[/tex]
benji123 said:
dn = A/d^4 dL + L/d^4 dA

n = A/d^4 x ΔL + L/d^4 x ΔA

n = ΔL/L + ΔA/A

Where do I go from here? Any help will be greatly appreciated :)
For the percent change in n, you want dn/n.
 
Mark44 said:
For the percent change in n, you want dn/n.

Thanks for the reply Mark :) and correcting me with the dn/dA and dn/dd situation!

I was wondering, how do I get the estimation when I have no values to work from for L and d?
 
You don't have L and d, but you have their relative errors: ΔL/L and Δd/d.
 
Mark44 said:
You don't have L and d, but you have their relative errors: ΔL/L and Δd/d.

What do I do with the relative error? As "Δd" will be 2% what will I use for "d" ?
 
No, Δd is not a percent value; it is the error in determining d. The relative error, which is what you are given, is Δd/d, and that is .02. Actually, what is given is that |Δd|/d <= .02. Same with L and ΔL.
 
So would it be...

% change in n = % change in L - (4 times % change in d)
% change in n = -2 - (4 times -2)
% change in n = -2 +8
% change in n = + 6%

Therefore, ±2% change in L and d = ±6% change in n?
 
benji123 said:
So would it be...

% change in n = % change in L - (4 times % change in d)
% change in n = -2 - (4 times -2)
% change in n = -2 +8
% change in n = + 6%

Therefore, ±2% change in L and d = ±6% change in n?
No. Where are you getting the -2 numbers?

You started off in the right direction, but didn't fix the errors I pointed out earlier, so let's start from the beginning.

n = AL/d4
[tex]dn = A(\frac{\partial n}{\partial L}~dL + \frac{\partial n}{\partial d}~dd)[/tex]

The percent change in n is Δn/n. Fill in the partial derivatives in the equation above and divide both sides by n.
 
There is a more elementary way.

[tex] n \propto L[/tex]

means that n increases with increasing L, while

[tex] n \propto d^{-4}[/tex]

means that n decreases with increasing d.

Therefore, the smallest value for n is obtained by taking the smallest value for L and the largest value for d:

[tex] n_{\mathrm{min}} = A \, \frac{L_{\mathrm{min}}}{d^{4}_{\mathrm{max}}}[/tex]

The largest value for n, on the other hand, is obtained by taking the largest value for L and the smallest value for d:

[tex] n_{\mathrm{max}} = A \, \frac{L_{\mathrm{max}}}{d^{4}_{\mathrm{min}}}[/tex]

In this way, you obtain an interval for the possible values of n:

[tex] n \in [n_{\mathrm{min}}, n_{\mathrm{max}}][/tex]

Instead of the interval notation, one usually uses the "techincal notation":

[tex] n = \bar{n} \pm \Delta n[/tex]

which actually means:

[tex] \left\{\begin{array}{l}<br /> n_{\mathrm{min}} = \bar{n} - \Delta n \\<br /> <br /> n_{\mathrm{max}} = \bar{n} + \Delta n<br /> \end{array}\right. \Leftrightarrow \left\{\begin{array}{l}<br /> \bar{n} = \frac{1}{2} \, (n_{\mathrm{min}} + n_{\mathrm{max}}) \\<br /> <br /> \bar{n} = \frac{1}{2} \, (n_{\mathrm{max}} - n_{\mathrm{min}}) \\<br /> \end{array}\right.[/tex]

Then, of course, the relative uncertainty, expressed in percent, is defined as:

[tex] \delta_{n} \equiv \frac{\Delta n}{\bar{n}} \cdot 100\%[/tex]

It is up to you to:
1. Find Lmin and Lmax by knowing [itex]\bar{L}[/itex] (the nominal value) and [itex]\Delta L = \delta_{L}/{100 \%} \, \bar{L}[/itex] (the absolute uncertainty);

2. Do the same for dmin and dmax;

3. Find nmin and nmax according to the above formulas;

4. Find [itex]\bar{n}[/itex] (nominal value) and [itex]\Delta n[/itex] (absolute uncertainty) according to the above formulas;

5. Find the relative uncertainty [itex]\delta_{n}[/itex].
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K