Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Eternal universe vs finite life of stars

  1. Jul 8, 2010 #1
    I heard on a recent podcast that most astronomers and physicists of the early 20 th century, if they thought about it at all, believed that the universe always existed, i. e. it had no beginning. Even Einstein accepted the Steady State Theory, along with many others.
    How did these astonomers and physicists reconcile their idea of the eternal universe with the finite lives of stars? Did they think that stars grew old , died, and regenerated themselves?
  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 8, 2010 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    My guess: they didn't think about it. In the early part of the 20th century most astronomers thought that the entire universe consisted of the milky way and the nearby stars (which are in the milky way).
  4. Jul 10, 2010 #3
    They generally followed Boltzmann's idea of statistical recurrance - that, given endless time, high energy configurations would spontaneously be regenerated. When they had to give an answer.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Similar Threads - Eternal universe finite Date
Interacting Universes Feb 25, 2018
I Moon Poles: Which is better? Jan 11, 2018
Multiverse and Eternal Inflation Disproved? Feb 5, 2015
Is matter eternal ? Nov 16, 2012
About Eternal Inflation and Spacetime Bubbles May 17, 2005