Euler's Formula Contradiction?

TheDemx27
Gold Member
Messages
169
Reaction score
13
I've been using euler's formula now more than I have in the past, (using it for circuit analysis stuff), and so its been floating around in my head a bit more.

Say you have [itex]e^{2πi}=1[/itex] and you take the natural log of both sides.

[itex]\log_e( e^{2πi})=\log_e(1)[/itex]
[itex]2πi=0[/itex]
uhhhhh... :confused:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The problem is that you are using the real natural logarithm, which is the inverse of the real exponential function [itex]e^x[/itex]. You need to use the complex logarithm.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TheDemx27
axmls said:
The problem is that you are using the real natural logarithm, which is the inverse of the real exponential function [itex]e^x[/itex]. You need to use the complex logarithm.
Ah, thankyou.
 
The general equation is ##e^{\pm 2ni\pi}=1##
The function ##e^{ix}## has periods of ##2\pi##, just as the trigonometric functions have periods of ##2\pi##
[i.e. although ##sin(2\pi)=sin(0),\ 2\pi\neq0##]
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K