Evaluate Complex Integral with Residue Theorem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral \(\int_1^2 (x+1) \sqrt[6]{\frac{x-1}{2-x}}dx\) can be evaluated using the residue theorem, resulting in the value \(\frac{31}{36}\pi\). A suggested substitution is \(u^6=\frac{x-1}{2-x}\), which transforms the integral into a rational function in \(u\). This allows for the evaluation over the entire real line, but requires careful handling of poles and contour integration. The discussion emphasizes the importance of algebraic manipulation to facilitate the application of residue calculus.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex analysis and residue theorem
  • Familiarity with integral calculus and substitution techniques
  • Knowledge of contour integration and pole identification
  • Experience with algebraic manipulation of functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the residue theorem in complex analysis
  • Learn about contour integration techniques and their applications
  • Explore advanced substitution methods in integral calculus
  • Investigate the properties of rational functions and their integrals
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone interested in advanced calculus techniques, particularly those focusing on complex analysis and integral evaluation methods.

paweld
Messages
253
Reaction score
0
How to evaluate the following integral using residue theorem:

<br /> \int_1^2 (x+1) \sqrt[6]{\frac{x-1}{2-x}}dx<br />

(The answer is \frac{31}{36}\pi)

Thanks for any help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Welcome to PF! :smile:

Show us how far you've got, applying the residue theorem, and where you're stuck, and then we'll know how to help. :wink:
 
That's actually a pretty tough question, in the sense that there's a lot of work involved in the calculation, but I'll get you started. You should notice that (x-1)/(2-x) goes from 0 at x=1 to infinity at x=2. That should suggest to you that you want to try the substitution u^6=(x-1)/(2-x). With some work you can use that to change the integral into a rational (even!) function in u. Since it's even you can change it into an integral over the whole real line (provided you remember to divide by 2 later). Now you just have to locate the poles etc. It looks nasty. I stopped doing the details after that. I hope this is a 'super challenge' question.
 
Last edited:
Just for habit, when dealing with complex numbers I prefer changing x's into z's. So you know you're dealing with complex stuff, such as integrals.

The problem when using residue calculus is that your contour is from 1 to 2, and in this case you residue is on 2. Which makes it break down quickly, however, if you do some nice conversions or apply some thoughtful series and you can change this =).

So, think about how you can change this algebraically to make it work for you. As a note z can be expressed in many ways.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K