Evaluate flux through a surface

  • Thread starter Thread starter cobolt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flux Surface
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves evaluating the flux through a surface \( s_2 \) in a specified region \( R \), which is a half ball bounded by a disc \( s_1 \) and a hemispherical shell. The force field given is \( F = -zi + y^2j + xk \).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to evaluate the integral of the force field dotted with the unit normal to the surface but expresses difficulty in completing the task. Some participants suggest considering the properties of conservative vector fields as a potential simplification. Others question whether the problem explicitly requires a surface integral, noting that the result might be inferred from the vector field's characteristics.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem requirements. There is a suggestion that the flux could be deduced without performing the integral directly, but no consensus has been reached on the best approach.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of specific requirements in the problem statement regarding the method of evaluation, which may influence the approach taken by participants.

cobolt
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Im asked to evaluate the flux through a surface s2.

The overall region R is a half ball bounded by disc s1 with y=0 and [tex]x^{2}[/tex]+z[tex]^{2}[/tex]=4 and the hemispherical shell s2 with y>=0 and [tex]x^{2}[/tex]+z[tex]^{2}[/tex]+y[tex]^{2}[/tex]=4.

In the region there exists a force with field F = -zi+y[tex]^{2}[/tex]j+xk.

I have tried evaluating the integral of F.n where n is the unit normal to R but am stuck of how to do this entirely.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
there may be an easier way to do this... do you know about conservative vectors fields?
 
I am aware of these but the question ask for it in this fashion. :\
 
which fashion - does it explictly ask for a surface inetgral to be performed as the reulst of the surface integral can be deduced from just the form of the vector field
 
integral of the field dotted with the unit normal to the surface S2.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K