Evaluating a fourier series using the firs 100terms

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around evaluating a Fourier series for a symmetric square wave function defined on specific intervals. The Fourier series expansion is provided, and the user seeks clarification on the notation "from x=0(pi/18)pi/2." It is explained that this notation indicates evaluating the series at increments of pi/18 from 0 to pi/2. The user expresses gratitude upon understanding the notation and the evaluation process. The thread highlights the importance of correctly interpreting mathematical notation in series evaluation.
paul143
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Well, the problem gave me a symmetric square wave f(x).

f(x) = 1, when |x|<pi/2 and -1, pi/2 < |x|< pi

I was able to solve for its Fourier series expansion given by:

f(x) = (4/pi) * \Sigma (-1)n cos(2n+1)x / 2n+1

Now the problem asked us to evaluate this series for x=0(pi/18)pi/2 using the first 100terms of the series.

Now this is where i was really stuck, i can't seem to grasp the meaning of "from x=0(pi/18)pi/2". I'm not familiar with this notation. Can anyone enlighten me please?

And if possible, point me in the right direction in evaluating this series?:) thanks so much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

You have to take the first 100 terms, sum them up, call it some function S(x), and then find values of S(x) from x = 0 to x = pi/2, in steps of pi/18 (which is what the notation means).
 
Last edited:
maverick280857 said:
Welcome to PF!

You have to the the first 100 terms, sum them up, call it some function S(x), and then find values of S(x) from x = 0 to x = pi/2, in steps of pi/18 (which is what the notation means).

ooohhh! i seee! thanks very much! :D now i understand :D
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top