Evaluating a fourier series using the firs 100terms

paul143
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Well, the problem gave me a symmetric square wave f(x).

f(x) = 1, when |x|<pi/2 and -1, pi/2 < |x|< pi

I was able to solve for its Fourier series expansion given by:

f(x) = (4/pi) * \Sigma (-1)n cos(2n+1)x / 2n+1

Now the problem asked us to evaluate this series for x=0(pi/18)pi/2 using the first 100terms of the series.

Now this is where i was really stuck, i can't seem to grasp the meaning of "from x=0(pi/18)pi/2". I'm not familiar with this notation. Can anyone enlighten me please?

And if possible, point me in the right direction in evaluating this series?:) thanks so much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

You have to take the first 100 terms, sum them up, call it some function S(x), and then find values of S(x) from x = 0 to x = pi/2, in steps of pi/18 (which is what the notation means).
 
Last edited:
maverick280857 said:
Welcome to PF!

You have to the the first 100 terms, sum them up, call it some function S(x), and then find values of S(x) from x = 0 to x = pi/2, in steps of pi/18 (which is what the notation means).

ooohhh! i seee! thanks very much! :D now i understand :D
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top