Evaluating complex multiplication?

Loren Booda
Messages
3,108
Reaction score
4
How might one comprehend the product of complex numbers

N
[pi](an+ibn)=C
n=1

such as by representation with vectors in the complex plane, or algebraic simplification? Specifically, I would like to know the value Re(C).
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi

Any complex number a+ib can be represented as R(& theta). Where R is the magnitude and & theta is the phase. So convert the complex number into R(& theta) form and multiply. The R parts multiply while the angle parts add up.

e.g. R(& theta)* P(& Theta) = R*P(& theta + & Theta)

Got it?


Sridhar
 
A bit rough, sridhar, but helpful in jogging my memory.

Can you or another be more mathematical in regard to the transform involved?

Is it tan-1(b/a)=[the] and r=(a2+b2)1/2?
 
Right...ish

if (a + bi) = r exp(iθ), then it is true that

r = (a^2 + b^2)^(1/2)
and
tan θ = b/a

But you have to make sure that θ is in the correct quadrant. (iow you might have to add π).
 
Hurkyl,

Is there a simplifying (exact) identity for the arithmetic series

N
[sum]tan-1(bn/an)
n=1

and for the geometric series

N
[pi](an2+bn2)1/2
n=1

or, more importantly, for my original statement concerning Re(C)?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top