?Evaluating Double Integral Using Polar Coords

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on evaluating the double integral of the function x³ + xy² using polar coordinates over a specified region. The region is identified as a half-circle of radius 3, and the transformation to polar coordinates is discussed, including the correct limits for integration. Participants point out errors in the original limits for theta and emphasize the need to include the Jacobian factor when converting from Cartesian to polar coordinates. After correcting the calculations, the final result of the integral is determined to be 486/5. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately setting limits and incorporating necessary factors in polar integration.
joemama69
Messages
390
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Use polar coords to evaluate the double integral x3 + xy2dydx from y = -(9-x2)1/2 to (9-x2)1/2, and x = 0 to 3

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



So the region is a half circle of radius 3, centered @ the origin, with only the possitive x side, (right side of circle)

x = rcosQ, y = rsinQ

the integral is r3cos3Q + r3cosQsinQ drdQ

after integration with respect to r i get and pluging in the limits

84/4 cos^3 Q + 81/4 cosQsinQ dQ

i looked up the integrals of cos^3Q in the back of my book and it is quite complex. Have i made any mistakes thus far, and is there an easier way to evaluate it
 
Physics news on Phys.org
x³ + xy² = r² cosθ. Check your algebra.
 
Also if you go from Cartesian to polar coordinates dxdy \Rightarrow r dr d\theta.
While not relevant to this problem \cos^3x is easily integrated by writing it as \cos x (1-\sin^2x) and substituting u=\sin x.
 
i think i messed up somehwere

\int r^3cosQdrdQ = .25r^4cosQ from 0 to 3
=\int81/4 cosQ dQ from 0 to pi = 81/4 sinQ from 0 to pi
sin(0) = 0, sin (pi) = 0
i got an answer of 0
 
Are you sure θ goes from 0 to π?
 


You forgot that when you transform from Cartesian to polar coordinates you have to add the Jacobian r (dx dy \Rightarrow r dr d\theta). Secondly your limits for \theta are off. You are integrating over the upper semi circle, but that is not the right region to integrate over. Draw the circle and add the Cartesian limits, over what section should you be integrating?
 


Q should go from -\frac{\pi}{2} to \frac{\pi}{2}.
 


Cyosis said:
You forgot that when you transform from Cartesian to polar coordinates you have to add the Jacobian r (dx dy \Rightarrow r dr d\theta). Secondly your limits for \theta are off. You are integrating over the upper semi circle, but that is not the right region to integrate over. Draw the circle and add the Cartesian limits, over what section should you be integrating?
Actually, he did include the "r" but you are correct that his limits of integration on \theta are wrong.
 


You're right I completely missed the r.
 
  • #10
uhhh huh, ok i didnt realize that mattered, i figured as long as it was 180 degrees it would be the same

but i think i did mess up the r

x(x2 + y2) = rcosQ* r2 = r3cosQ


then i add the jacobian r and my integral is for r4cosQdrdQ

the only thing that changes is the 81/4 becomes 243/5

so the final answer is

243/5 + 243/5 = 486/5
 
  • #11
That's correct.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K