Evaluating Integral Expressions - No Sq. Units

Mentallic
Homework Helper
Messages
3,802
Reaction score
95
I'm asked to evaluate:

\int_{-1}^{1} x(x-1)(x+1)dx

The problem is that the question doesn't say anything about area, and we have been notified in class that unless otherwise stated, don't express the answer in sq. units.
However, I also have a problem that, if this were to find the area on a graph, I would notice the symmetry about the origin and y-axis and thus express the integral as:

-2 \int_{0}^{1} x(x-1)(x+1)dx

Now, the first integral (if not area) is equal to 0, while the second is not. Which would be the correct answer?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
They do not give the same answer, because they are not equivalent.
You said that there is a symmetry around the origin and y-axis, but note that it is actually an anti-symmetry. That is, if f(x) = x(x - 1)(x + 1), then f(-x) = -f(x) and not f(-x) = f(x). You can note this by sketching the graph, or noticing that (x - 1)(x + 1) is symmetric and x is anti-symmetric, so their product is anti-symmetric.
So you are arguing
\int_{-1}^{1} f(x)dx=\int_{-1}^{0} f(x) dx+\int_{0}^{1} f(x) dx
If you substitute x to -x in the first integral they don't add up, they cancel out.
 
Thats on behalf of my poor attempt at putting my thoughts into words.
By symmetry, I meant that they are odd functions, as you stated.

I see you are heading into the direction of making it equal zero. If the question were asked slightly different. Say, rather than 'evaluate' the question asked 'find the area of', I would instead convert the integral so as not to get a value of zero.

Basically my question is, if the question doesn't mention area, am I safe to assume this integral equals zero? or would I have to find it as if it were finding area/volume etc. or would I have to find both?

p.s. my teacher is really picky on the details and will try oppose any 100% marks as I've noticed from a previous assessment task.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top