Evanescent waves, wavevector, and Poynting vector

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the properties and behavior of evanescent waves, specifically focusing on the direction and magnitude of the wavevector \( k \), as well as its relationship with the Poynting vector. The scope includes theoretical aspects and conceptual clarifications related to wave propagation in different media.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the wavevector \( k \) for evanescent waves is complex, indicating exponential damping in certain directions.
  • It is mentioned that in total internal reflection, the wavevector has a real component parallel to the surface and an imaginary component perpendicular to it.
  • In conducting media, the wave is said to be exponentially damped in the direction of propagation.
  • Participants discuss that the relationship between \( k \) and the Poynting vector is not straightforward, particularly in anisotropic materials where the electric field may not be perpendicular to the propagation vector.
  • Some argue that the Poynting vector can point in the opposite direction to the wavevector in left-handed materials, highlighting a distinction between energy flow and wave propagation direction.
  • There is a description of the real and imaginary parts of the wavevector, where the real part relates to the wavenumber and direction of wave travel, while the imaginary part describes decay rates and directions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between the wavevector \( k \) and the Poynting vector, particularly in anisotropic and left-handed materials. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these relationships.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the complexity of wavevector definitions in different media, the dependence on material properties, and the unresolved nature of how these factors interact in various scenarios.

wil3
Messages
177
Reaction score
1
For an evanescent wave, in what direction does the wavevector k point? In several lectures that I've seen in class, it appears to point in some direction that is not normal or along the interface, which confuses me.

Additionally, for all wave vectors, what exactly is the magnitude of k? In the 1D case, I'm aware that it is a simply the wave number, but does it have any special meaning in other cases?

Finally, what is the relationship between k and the Poynting vector? I'm aware that they necessarily point in the same direction, but I'm curious if there's a relationship between their magnitudes.

These concepts were very poorly explained in lecture, and so I would appreciate any advice.
 
Science news on Phys.org
There are several circumstances where you find inhomogeneous or evanescent waves. In all of them the wave vector k is complex, implying that the wave is exponentially damped in some direction.

a) Total internal reflection, in which case the wave vector has a real component parallel to the surface and an imaginary one perpendicular to it.

b) Wave propagation in a conducting medium such as a metal. In this case the wave is exponentially damped in the same direction as the direction of propagation.

c) Some diffraction problems (see Born & Wolf, sect 11.4)

Which direction does k point and what is its magnitude? Well, k is complex! So it points in a complex direction. You can define in the usual way a phase velocity vector, index of refraction, dielectric constant, but they will all be complex too.
 
wil3 said:
Finally, what is the relationship between k and the Poynting vector? I'm aware that they necessarily point in the same direction, but I'm curious if there's a relationship between their magnitudes.

Not necessarily true, actually. In an anisotropic material where the index of refraction varies with direction, the electric field may not be perpendicular to the propagation vector (although the displacement field will be). This leads to a Poynting vector which is not parallel to k.
 
johng23 said:
Not necessarily true, actually. In an anisotropic material where the index of refraction varies with direction, the electric field may not be perpendicular to the propagation vector (although the displacement field will be). This leads to a Poynting vector which is not parallel to k.

The Poynting vector can also point in the opposite direction from the wavevector in left-handed materials (meta-materials). The Poynting vector describes the direction of energy flow, and the wavevector describes the direction that the waveform is traveling.

A complex vector like k has real and imaginary parts, and each part has vector length (magnitude) and vector directionality. The vector length of the real part of the wavevector is just the wavenumber (a description of the spatial frequency of wave peaks). The vector directionality of the real part describes the directions the waveshape is traveling. The vector length of the imaginary part describes the rate at which the wave spatially decays, and the vector directionality of the imaginary part described the direction in which the wave is decaying.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K