Evanescent waves, wavevector, and Poynting vector

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 9K views
wil3
Messages
177
Reaction score
1
For an evanescent wave, in what direction does the wavevector k point? In several lectures that I've seen in class, it appears to point in some direction that is not normal or along the interface, which confuses me.

Additionally, for all wave vectors, what exactly is the magnitude of k? In the 1D case, I'm aware that it is a simply the wave number, but does it have any special meaning in other cases?

Finally, what is the relationship between k and the Poynting vector? I'm aware that they necessarily point in the same direction, but I'm curious if there's a relationship between their magnitudes.

These concepts were very poorly explained in lecture, and so I would appreciate any advice.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are several circumstances where you find inhomogeneous or evanescent waves. In all of them the wave vector k is complex, implying that the wave is exponentially damped in some direction.

a) Total internal reflection, in which case the wave vector has a real component parallel to the surface and an imaginary one perpendicular to it.

b) Wave propagation in a conducting medium such as a metal. In this case the wave is exponentially damped in the same direction as the direction of propagation.

c) Some diffraction problems (see Born & Wolf, sect 11.4)

Which direction does k point and what is its magnitude? Well, k is complex! So it points in a complex direction. You can define in the usual way a phase velocity vector, index of refraction, dielectric constant, but they will all be complex too.
 
wil3 said:
Finally, what is the relationship between k and the Poynting vector? I'm aware that they necessarily point in the same direction, but I'm curious if there's a relationship between their magnitudes.

Not necessarily true, actually. In an anisotropic material where the index of refraction varies with direction, the electric field may not be perpendicular to the propagation vector (although the displacement field will be). This leads to a Poynting vector which is not parallel to k.
 
johng23 said:
Not necessarily true, actually. In an anisotropic material where the index of refraction varies with direction, the electric field may not be perpendicular to the propagation vector (although the displacement field will be). This leads to a Poynting vector which is not parallel to k.

The Poynting vector can also point in the opposite direction from the wavevector in left-handed materials (meta-materials). The Poynting vector describes the direction of energy flow, and the wavevector describes the direction that the waveform is traveling.

A complex vector like k has real and imaginary parts, and each part has vector length (magnitude) and vector directionality. The vector length of the real part of the wavevector is just the wavenumber (a description of the spatial frequency of wave peaks). The vector directionality of the real part describes the directions the waveshape is traveling. The vector length of the imaginary part describes the rate at which the wave spatially decays, and the vector directionality of the imaginary part described the direction in which the wave is decaying.