Evidence supporting the existense of tachyons?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BookWorm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Evidence
AI Thread Summary
There is currently no empirical evidence supporting the existence of tachyons, as their existence remains purely theoretical. The concept of tachyons is linked to the relationship between time and the speed of light, suggesting that anything traveling faster than light would also travel backward in time. Discussions highlight the complexities of defining tachyons and their potential implications in physics. Some participants argue that if tachyons were real, we might have discovered them by now, while others emphasize the unpredictable nature of scientific discovery. Ultimately, the conversation reflects the ongoing intrigue surrounding tachyons and their theoretical framework.
BookWorm
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Is there any evidence supporting the existense of tachyons? Or is it all theory?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not a shred of evidence.

- Warren
 
No evidence currently exists, yet is open to new discoveries as may be found.
 
No evidence - pure theory of time and c

Bookworm,

The beauty of mathematics and physics is that they sometimes allow us to predict things before they are observed.

The theory of the tachyon is based on your definition or perception of the dimension we call time and its relationship to c.

Nothing can travel faster than the speed of light unless it’s never traveled any slower. To travel faster than the speed of light would require traveling backward in time, a particle, call a tachyon.

Or is a tachyon a single anti-photon quantum tunnelling through time, who knows?

There is no scientific evidence supporting the existence of the tachyon, it is all based on your option of the pure theory, on which it is based apon.

Reality is more bizarre than fiction!

Then you have to explain all the facts.

I hope that has answered your question about the tachyon theorem.
 
I think you mean, Terry, that there is no empirical evidence, not there is no scientific evidence.

And things may travel faster than the speed of light, and slow down and everything. Here's an example by a well known relativist:

suppose we have a sufficiently long pair of scissors that we shut. Then the speed at which the point where the blades first meet may travel towards the end of the blades at faster than the speed of light, physical constraints of building and shutting the things excepted. There is no "information transmitted" to violate any inertial frame arguments etc.
 
If tachyons do exist, should we not have found them some time before we started looking? :wink:
 
That depends on your definition of antimatter

LURCH said:
If tachyons do exist, should we not have found them some time before we started looking? :wink:

Lurch, that's the best quote I heard a tachyon ago.

Which depends of course on everyone's definition of what antimatter is?

And what a tachyon is? - If you have the time?
 

Similar threads

Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
1K
Back
Top