Evolution of obligate parasites

  • Thread starter aychamo
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Evolution
In summary, the professor suggested that parasitic flatworms probably evolved from free-living nematodes that found a niche in fish intestinal tracts. This led to facultative parasites, and then to abligated parasites. Some parasites still have eyes, but others have lost organs. It's interesting to think of parasites in evolutionary terms, and it's interesting to read about 'the world from the pov of a infectious bacterium (for humans)'.
  • #1
aychamo
375
0
Hey guys;

I just started a class in parasitology this fall, we haven't covered anything yet, just looked as some cases of people infected with parasites.

I was wondering how obligate parasites could have evolved. My thinking is that they were originally facultative parasites that found a niche in a host, and did so well in the host that features that would separate an obligate and facultative parasite were no longer selected for or against, thus eventually leaving a vestigial trait (such as eyes in blind cave bats).

I guess that makes sense? Since they were already in the host, things that would let them survive outside the host were no longer necessary and weren't a target of natural selection? Since natural selection wouldn't act on them, their quality would not matter and they could then become vestigial.

Assuming this is correct, would it be possible to look at an obligate parasite and see any vestigial traits?

Thank you
Aychamo
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #2
From parasitology course, the prof did a small history of the possible evolution of parasite of parasitic flatworms. What he suggest that free-living nematodes probably started to find a niche in fish intestinal tract. As time pass, the adaption to the niche lead to facutlative parasite and then to abligated parasite.

Some parasite still have eye spot but it still might be in used as some have a certain time outside the host. Other have lost some organ system. For example, the Cestoda (tapeworms) have lost their gut through evolution.

I will look more into it.
 
  • #3
muscular system - YES

* Longitudinal, circular and transverse muscle cells allow contraction in every direction.
* Muscular system well developed in turbellarians and flukes, vestigial in cestodes.

http://www.bio.miami.edu/dana/160/160S04_14.html

Vestigial organ are probably hard to seen in most parasite because they are more simple organism lacking most of the complex system. In most parasite, there an organ reduction or disapearance rather than .

What you said is also right. I would not said that natural selection did not act on the parasite. It might be that parasite lacking some organs had an advantage over parasite having all the organs. These mutants would reproduce more quick. Also many parasite have asexual reproduction means. So a new advantage could spread quicker. Also there might selection against certain mutation that arose before other mutation. Some lost have a miminal effect if certain components are missing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4
Ahh, I see what you are saying about "not saying that natural selection didn't act on them." Perhaps lacking certain features would mean the parasite doesn't have to spend as much time "feeding" and can spend more time reproducing or what-not.

I *love* thinking of things in evolutionary terms.
 
  • #5
aychamo said:
Ahh, I see what you are saying about "not saying that natural selection didn't act on them." Perhaps lacking certain features would mean the parasite doesn't have to spend as much time "feeding" and can spend more time reproducing or what-not.

I *love* thinking of things in evolutionary terms.
Have you been introduced to 'the world from the pov of a infectious bacterium (for humans)'? or 'why crowded human cities are GOOD!'
 
  • #6
No I haven't, are these books??
 
  • #7
No, it's just an interesting exercise; instead of thinking of the 'flu (say), or smallpox from our human point of view (pov), think of how the virus or bacterium 'views' humans ... how does it get its host to work for it? what conditions suit the nasty bug best? how does evolution drive the virus or bacterium to change (and how does its host respond)? Of course, these nasties don't have a 'purpose', or a mind ... but when looked at in evolutionary terms, it's really quite fascinating. :smile:
 
  • #8
It seems that specialization is a common theme in evolutionary history. Not too surprising that a parasite that once "played the field" found a particular niche & adapted specifically to that alone (especially since there are examples of parasites becoming simpler in their form as they evolved over time). Should be an interesting class.
 

1. What is an obligate parasite?

An obligate parasite is a type of organism that relies on a host organism for survival and reproduction. It cannot live independently and must obtain nutrients and resources from its host in order to survive.

2. How do obligate parasites evolve?

Obligate parasites evolve through a process called coevolution, where they and their host species adapt and evolve in response to each other. This can lead to a highly specialized relationship between the parasite and its host.

3. Can obligate parasites become free-living organisms?

In some cases, obligate parasites can evolve to become free-living organisms. This can happen when a parasite gains the ability to obtain resources from its environment instead of relying on a host. However, this process is rare and may take a long time to occur.

4. What are some examples of obligate parasites?

Some common examples of obligate parasites include tapeworms, malaria parasites, and parasitic wasps. These organisms have evolved to depend on a specific host species for their survival.

5. How does the evolution of obligate parasites impact the host species?

The evolution of obligate parasites can have both positive and negative impacts on the host species. On one hand, it can lead to the development of defense mechanisms in the host, making them more resistant to future infections. On the other hand, it can also cause harm to the host and potentially lead to their extinction if the parasite becomes too specialized and dependent on them.

Similar threads

  • Biology and Medical
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • Biology and Medical
3
Replies
75
Views
8K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top