Evolution vs Bible: Charles Darwin's Theory

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kinn Sein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Evolution
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the preference for Charles Darwin's Evolution Theory over the Biblical account of creation. Proponents of Darwin's theory argue that it effectively explains the dynamic and changing nature of life in response to time and environmental factors. The emphasis is placed on the scientific basis of Darwin's theory, contrasting it with religious perspectives, which are deemed inappropriate for the conversation. The preference for a scientific understanding of evolution highlights the importance of evidence-based explanations in understanding the natural world.
Kinn Sein
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Which one do you believe, Charles Darwin's Evolution Theory or Bible ?
I prefer Darwin's theory because his theory pointed everything varying with time and environment. Not everything in this universe is not stable and static but moving and dynamic. And his theory is scientific theory.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Religious topics are not permitted here.

- Warren
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...

Similar threads

Back
Top