EW global fit,pole mass,gluon fusion

  • Thread starter Thread starter wlln
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fusion Global
wlln
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Could you explain the meanings of EW global fit,pole mass,gluon fusion? Thank you very much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
EW Global fit: Ignoring neutrino masses for the moment, there are 19 parameters in the Standard Model of particle physics. However, there are dozens of measured quantities. Therefore, the study of particle physics is overconstrained and we can use this over-measuring to see if we can find discrepancies. So we use the first 19 of the measurements to nail down the parameters, and then we can compare the remaining measurements to what the theory predicts.

Pole Mass: Mass is a funny thing in quantum field theory. Technically it's not well defined (it's divergent). One must specify a "renormalization scheme" by which we define the mass. "Pole Mass Scheme" is a particular (but by no means unique!) choice, where we DEFINE the mass as the value of the momentum where the field propagator (2-point Green's function) diverges (has a pole). The full inverse propagator goes like

(p^2 - m0^2 - A(p^2))

and we define the number Mpole^2 to be the value of p^2 that makes this denominator vanish. Here m0 is the "bare mass" - the parameter in the theory before renormalization.

Gluon fusion: This is just the Feynman diagram where two gluons come together and produce something. Gluons (unlike photons) can do this due to the nature of QCD - that is, photons cannot interact with each other (since they're electrically neutral) but gluons carry strong nuclear charge and can therefore interact. In fact, there IS such a thing as photon fusion, but it's VERY suppressed and therefore not worth talking about, unless you're doing quantum optics, which is another forum. :wink:

Hope this helps get you started. Also check out the standard sites like wikipedia, or even google.
 
thank you very much
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top