I Exact expression for the tensor-to-scalar ratio

AI Thread Summary
The expression for the tensor-to-scalar ratio r in cold inflation, given as r=16ε_H = -16(Ḣ/H²), is identified as a lowest-order approximation. To obtain an exact value for r, one must numerically compute the amplitudes of the tensor and scalar perturbation spectra at the relevant scale. The discussion highlights the need for references regarding the scalar amplitude P_S in warm inflation, noting that P_T is likely similar to that in cold inflation due to its weak coupling with the thermal background. A suggested resource for further reading on this topic is provided. Understanding these nuances is crucial for accurate calculations in cosmological models.
Whitehole
Messages
128
Reaction score
4
Based on the vast cosmology texts, I have seen that the expression for the tensor-to-scalar ratio ##r## in cold inflation is,

##r=16\epsilon_H = -16\frac{\dot H}{H^2}\qquad## where, ##~~~\epsilon_H = -\frac{\dot H}{H^2}##

##H## is the Hubble parameter, and ##\epsilon_H## is the Hubble slow roll parameter.

I want to know if this expression is exact or approximation only? I want to numerically compute ##r## but in the case of warm inflation.
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
Whitehole said:
Based on the vast cosmology texts, I have seen that the expression for the tensor-to-scalar ratio ##r## in cold inflation is,

##r=16\epsilon_H = -16\frac{\dot H}{H^2}\qquad## where, ##~~~\epsilon_H = -\frac{\dot H}{H^2}##

##H## is the Hubble parameter, and ##\epsilon_H## is the Hubble slow roll parameter.

I want to know if this expression is exact or approximation only? I want to numerically compute ##r## but in the case of warm inflation.
It's a lowest-order approximation. To get an exact value, you must numerically compute the amplitudes of the tensor and scalar perturbation spectra at the scale of interest.
 
##\tilde \omega##
bapowell said:
It's a lowest-order approximation. To get an exact value, you must numerically compute the amplitudes of the tensor and scalar perturbation spectra at the scale of interest.
Oh, since ##~r=\frac{P_T}{P_S}~## where ##P_T## is the tensor amplitude and ##P_S## is the scalar amplitude. But where can I find a reference for ##P_S## in warm inflation? I only know of that in cold inflation, and I think ##P_T## is the same as in the cold inflation since ##P_T## doesn't couple strongly to the thermal background so gravitational waves are only generated by quantum fluctuations.
 
Last edited:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top