Exact solutions for reflectance, transmittance, absorption?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding exact solutions for surface transmittance (r), surface reflectance (t), and absorption coefficient (A) in thick glass samples using spectrophotometers. The user presents equations for total reflected (R) and transmitted light (T) and expresses the challenge of solving for the unknown material properties due to the complexity of the algebra involved. Suggestions include using Fresnel equations, but the user lacks knowledge of the materials' refractive indices, complicating this approach. The conversation also touches on measuring semitransparent polymers and the need for a method to derive r, t, and A from experimental spectral measurements. A proposed solution involves forming a ratio of reflectance and transmittance for different thicknesses to isolate and solve for the unknowns.
M_1
Messages
30
Reaction score
1
I'm measuring transmittance through and reflectance from thick glass samples, using spectrophotometers. Does anyone know if there's an exact solution for the surface transmittance r, surface reflectance t, and absorption coefficient A (as in Beer-Lamberts law). For a specific wavelength the equation for total reflected light from the sample, R, is

R=r(1+t2e-2Ad)/(1-r2e-2Ad)

and the equation for the total transmitted light through the sample, T, is

T=t2e-Ad/(1-r2e-2Ad)

R and T are measured, thus known variables. So we have the unknown material properties r, t, and A, and two equations. I can measure a sample of the same material with another thickness d and then I have four equations and three unknowns. This should theoretically be enough but the algebraic becomes very complicated and I wonder if there actually is an analytic solution.

Of course I can approximate 1>>rre-2Ad in the second equation and obtain A by dividing the second equation for one thickness with the same equation for another thickness, but then it is no longer the exact solution.

Any help is most appreciated, as always. Thanks!
 
Science news on Phys.org
M_1 said:
Does anyone know if there's an exact solution for the surface transmittance r, surface reflectance t, and absorption coefficient A
For surface reflectance and transmittance, you can use Fresnel equations. For the absorption, I think it will be easier to just look up at the table of the corresponding material.
 
Thanks! But I don't know the materials properties. Therefore I don't know the complex refraction index and cannot use the Fresnel equations.
 
For Fresnel equations, you only need to know the used wavelength, the refractive index corresponding to this wavelength, and the angle of incidence (which I think should be normal given the form of the total reflectance and transmittance). Try typing the name of that glass in your browser to see if there is refractive index table already available for that material.
 
Ok I see what you mean. But I also sometimes measure on semitransparent polymers which I have now knowledge about, and sometimes I don't know which glass I have either! What I'm looking for is an exact method to use experimental measurements of spectral reflectance and transmittance in order to calculate the material properties r, t, and A.
 
Does not seem too complicated. Let R, T be the reflectance and transmission for thickness d, and R', T' the corresponding ones at thickness d'.
Then form RT'/(R'T) and solve for ##t^2##. Insert into the equation for T and solve for ##r^2##. Insert both ##t^2## and ##r^2## into the equation for R and you will get an expression which only contains a in terms of R, T, d and d'.
 
I would like to use a pentaprism with some amount of magnification. The pentaprism will be used to reflect a real image at 90 degrees angle but I also want the reflected image to appear larger. The distance between the prism and the real image is about 70cm. The pentaprism has two reflecting sides (surfaces) with mirrored coating and two refracting sides. I understand that one of the four sides needs to be curved (spherical curvature) to achieve the magnification effect. But which of the...
Back
Top