What is the connection between Ramanujan and the value of infinity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Evenus1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinity Value
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a query about an equation that equates infinity to 1.5, which the original poster, Ewen, is unable to locate. A response suggests that Ewen may be referring to concepts related to Ramanujan and the Euler Zeta function, providing a link for further exploration. The connection between Ramanujan's work and the concept of infinity is highlighted, indicating a deeper mathematical relationship. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of infinity in mathematical contexts. Understanding these connections can enhance comprehension of advanced mathematical theories.
Evenus1
Messages
29
Reaction score
2
hey
I was browsing the web a while ago and I found an equation for infinity to equal 1.5 when subjected to a equation. however I can no longer find this. I was wondering if anyone knew what it was and if they could explain how it works.
many thanks
Ewen
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top