Examining the Accuracy of "Moon's Orbit Around Earth"

AI Thread Summary
The discussion examines the accuracy of the statement that the Moon moves in a near-circular orbit around Earth, emphasizing that both bodies orbit their common center of mass due to gravitational forces. The mass of the Moon and Earth is compared, revealing that the barycenter of the Earth-Moon system is located about 4,670 km from Earth's center, which is approximately 1,000 miles below the Earth's surface. The term "appreciably" is debated, as the barycenter's position indicates that the Earth's motion is indeed affected by the Moon's presence, albeit minimally. Additionally, comparisons are made to the Sun-Earth system, highlighting the differences in mass and the resulting barycenter location. Overall, the discussion clarifies that while the Moon's orbit is primarily influenced by Earth's gravity, the interaction is more complex than it may initially appear.
unrepentant
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
hey,
can somebody please help me examine the truth of the statement

"the moon moves in a near-circular orbit around earth. because the Earth is so much more massive, it own motion is not appreciably affected by the moons presence"
?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
unrepentant said:
hey,
can somebody please help me examine the truth of the statement

"the moon moves in a near-circular orbit around earth. because the Earth is so much more massive, it own motion is not appreciably affected by the moons presence"
?

Gravity affects both objects equally (equal and opposite reaction). The result is that both objects orbit their combined center of mass.

Mass of the Moon: 7.349 x 10^22 kg
Mass of the Earth: 5.9736 x 10^24 kg
Average distance between the two: 384,400 km

Find the combined center of mass and you'll find it lies inside the Earth. I guess "appreciably" is a subjective term, since the combined center of mass is still quite a ways from the Earth's center of mass.
 
It's about 400 miles from centre is it not?
 
According to this article - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_of_mass

the barycenter of the earth-moon system is 4670 km from the center of the earth. For comparison, the Earth's radius is approximately 6380 km. The barycenter is about 1000 miles below the Earth's surface on a line between the center of the moon and center of earth.

Perhaps one is thinking of the barycenter of the sun-earth system.
If the Earth were the only satellite of the Sun and the Earth were moving in an elliptical orbit about the center of mass of the Sun-Earth system then the Sun would also be moving in an elliptical orbit about that same center of mass. The scales of the orbits would be in proportion to the ratio of the masses. The Sun is about 333 thousand times as massive as the Earth. Thus if the average radius of the Earth's orbit is 93 million miles (150 million km) then the radius of the Sun's counter orbit is about 280 miles (450 km). The center of mass of the Sun-Earth system is well within the body of the Sun.
http://www.applet-magic.com/centermass.htm - This also mentions the barycenter of the earth-moon system.
 
Last edited:
hey thanks guys this info helped alot.
tony that animation was pretty good thanks
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top