Example of a linear subset of Hilbert space that is not closed

margaret37
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove that for a linear set M a subset of Hilbert space, that the set perpendicular to the set perpendicular to M is equal to M iff M is closed.

The Attempt at a Solution



I already have my proof -- but what is an example of a linear subset of H that is not closed?

I think I understand that we need an infinite dimensional Hilbert space -- that in a finite space M would have to be closed.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If H is a Hilbert space, and {e1,e2,...} is an orthonormal basis, then if you define S={a1*e1+a2*e2+...} where a finite number of the ai are nonzero, then S would be a subspace of H, right? But it wouldn't be closed.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for answering, unfortunately I'm still confused.

Why wouldn't it be closed? If I set up a sequence within S, wouldn't it necessarily converge to something also inside S.
 
margaret37 said:
Thank you for answering, unfortunately I'm still confused.

Why wouldn't it be closed? If I set up a sequence within S, wouldn't it necessarily converge to something also inside S.

p1=e1, p2=e1+e2/2, p3=e1+e2/2+e3/4, p4=e1+e2/2+e3/4+e4/8. Do you see where this is going? Aren't all of the pi in S? Isn't the limit in the Hilbert space, since H is a complete metric space?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top