Example Proof using Complex Numbers

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of De Moivre's Theorem and Euler's Formula in complex number transformations, specifically in Example 1.2 from a physics document. The user initially struggles with the notation "mSYMBOL" and the conversion between trigonometric functions and complex exponentials. Clarifications reveal that the imaginary part of a complex exponential can be expressed as a sine function, and the user successfully resolves their confusion regarding the transformation process, particularly the derivation of terms like 2rcos(2x) in the denominator.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of De Moivre's Theorem
  • Familiarity with Euler's Formula
  • Basic knowledge of complex numbers and their properties
  • Ability to manipulate trigonometric identities
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Euler's Formula in depth
  • Explore advanced applications of De Moivre's Theorem
  • Learn about complex number transformations in mathematical proofs
  • Investigate the relationship between trigonometric functions and complex exponentials
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, particularly those studying complex numbers, as well as educators and anyone involved in mathematical proofs or physics applications involving complex analysis.

Chantry
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://www-thphys.physics.ox.ac.uk/people/JamesBinney/complex.pdf
Example 1.2 (Page 6)

Homework Equations


De Moivre's Theorem, Euler's Formula, and other simple complex number theory formulas

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm having troubles understanding the format, which makes me thing the author is assuming prior knowledge in another area of math.

What I don't understand is where he gets the mSYMBOL format from. I don't know what that symbol is, so I couldn't google it. I get all of the simplifying, except for when the conversion happens to and from the mSYMBOL. It looks like he's simply converting the sin(2n + 1) to the complex exponential function, but how can you do that without i?

I know sin(n) = 1/(2i) * (e^(in)-e^(-in)), but that's not even close to the result they got.

If that's the case, then my question is, how is this transformation happening?

Again, I understand the simplifying of the series, just not the transformation to and from the complex exponential.

Hopefully I explained that well enough. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That symbol just means the imaginary part.

For example for Euler's formula e=cosθ+ isinθ so that Imaginary part of e, written as Im(e) = sinθ.

So the imaginary part of ei(2n+1)θ, written as Im(ei(2n+1)θ)=sin(2n+1)θ
 
Thanks for the help :).

I now understand where they get the sin(x) + rsin(x) in the numerator, and where the 1 + r^2 comes from in the denominator. However, how do they get the 2rcos(2x) in the denominator?

EDIT: Never mind, I figured it out.

I forgot about cos(x) = 1/2(e^ix + e^-ix).

Thanks again.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K