Excess of chemicals found US water

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemicals Water
AI Thread Summary
Concerns about the safety of drinking water in the U.S. have been heightened following the lead contamination crisis in Flint, prompting many individuals to use water filters. However, there are questions regarding the effectiveness of these filters in removing contaminants like chromium-6. Reports indicate that environmental groups have raised alarms about chromium-6 levels in tap water, claiming that 218 million Americans are affected. Critics argue that these claims are misleading, as they often reference California's stringent public health goals, which are significantly lower than federal standards. For example, California's goal is 500 times stricter than the legal limit for chromium, leading to exaggerated perceptions of risk. Local water quality reports show varying levels of chromium-6, with some areas having low concentrations, but the absence of chromium-6 in reports may not necessarily indicate safety. Additionally, regulations like ROHS restrict hexavalent chromium in electronics, yet its presence in non-electronic products remains largely unregulated.
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
Seems like the US is having a raw deal, have you checked your water is safe to drink?

https://www.sciencedaily.com/videos/0233de5148b63e6e2bd95b0fcb0daca8.htm
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
I don't know, but after the whole lead scandal in Flint I've been drinking my tap water from a filter.
 
http://www.ewg.org/interactive-maps/2016-chromium6-lower-48.php

I drink water from a filter, but don't know if it gets rid of chromium-6...

...answer: no: http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/getting-the-chromium-out-of-your-water/

The story is pretty misleading though (shocking, right?) as it is from an environmentalist group and utilizes a California "public health goal" that is 500x more stringent than the legal requirement of 10 ppb and 5,000x more stringent than the federal standard of 100 ppb (that's for all types of chromium). The headline that it "taints tap water of 218 million Americans" is misleading in that if you have a sensitive enough detector you are likely to find everything in tap water. The article argues that the CA standard was weakened by lobbyists, which is almost certainly true. But it is also almost certainly true that the "goal" was a ridiculous knee-jerk reaction to the Erin Brockovich incident...which itself may have been exaggerated, since the estimated peak concentration was only 20ppb (average; 1 ppb).

My county (Montgomery, PA) has an average of 0.2 and high of 2.6 ppb. My town's water authority didn't seem to be on the list, but I was able to google it: http://www.collegeville-pa.gov/sites/default/files/pictures/2014-WaterReport.pdf
Chromium-6 wasn't on it, but I'm not sure if that is because it wasn't detected or not.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Drakkith, Fervent Freyja and rbelli1
russ_watters said:
chromium-6

Hexavalent chromium is disallowed in new electronics under ROHS but you can have it on abundance on anything non-electronic. Under the ROHS rules about separable materials you can have an arbitrarily small amount of a substance and still fail. Then you have chromed bumpers and no-one cares? An lead acid batteries too.

BoB
 
On August 10, 2025, there was a massive landslide on the eastern side of Tracy Arm fjord. Although some sources mention 1000 ft tsunami, that height represents the run-up on the sides of the fjord. Technically it was a seiche. Early View of Tracy Arm Landslide Features Tsunami-causing slide was largest in decade, earthquake center finds https://www.gi.alaska.edu/news/tsunami-causing-slide-was-largest-decade-earthquake-center-finds...
Hello, I’m currently writing a series of essays on Pangaea, continental drift, and Earth’s geological cycles. While working on my research, I’ve come across some inconsistencies in the existing theories — for example, why the main pressure seems to have been concentrated in the northern polar regions. So I’m curious: is there any data or evidence suggesting that an external cosmic body (an asteroid, comet, or another massive object) could have influenced Earth’s geology in the distant...
Back
Top