Excess pressure on the concave side of the meniscus

AI Thread Summary
Excess pressure on the concave side of the meniscus is explained by the balance of vertical resultant forces due to surface tension. The shape of the meniscus is influenced by two main forces: adhesion, which pulls the water upwards along the container's surface, and cohesion, which maintains the integrity of the water's surface. While the vertical component of force is acknowledged, it does not directly dictate the meniscus shape, as the curvature results from the interplay of adhesion and cohesion. In thin tubes, the adhesive force can overcome gravity, causing the water to rise. Overall, the meniscus shape is a complex balance of these forces, though existing models do not perfectly match experimental outcomes.
Joel Jacon
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Why is there excess pressure always on the concave side or surface of the meniscus?

In my book it is also written that excess pressure balance the vertical resultant forces due to surface tension.
How can a pressure balance a force?

My teacher said that shape of meniscus does not depend on vertical component of force.
Which force is she talking about? Why doesn't the shape of meniscus does not depend on vertical force as there are also curved meniscus so shouldn't vertical force should have some role to play in the curved surface?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are two forces involved in capillary action which dictate the curvature of the meniscus.
1. The adhesion of the molecules to the surface of the container - so water adheres to glass which drags the sides of the meniscus upwards
2. The cohesion of water which glues the surface of the water together as in raindrops.
So the shape of the meniscus is the balance, basically, of these two forces.

Naturally if a tube is thin the grip on the sides of the tube pulling the water upwards overcomes the force caused by gravity and pulls the water upwards. There are a few models for this but interestingly none of them exactly predict experimental results.

There a few complexities which I have left out for the sake of brevity.
 
Puma said:
There are two forces involved in capillary action which dictate the curvature of the meniscus.
1. The adhesion of the molecules to the surface of the container - so water adheres to glass which drags the sides of the meniscus upwards
2. The cohesion of water which glues the surface of the water together as in raindrops.
So the shape of the meniscus is the balance, basically, of these two forces.

Naturally if a tube is thin the grip on the sides of the tube pulling the water upwards overcomes the force caused by gravity and pulls the water upwards. There are a few models for this but interestingly none of them exactly predict experimental results.

There a few complexities which I have left out for the sake of brevity.

What about the shape of meniscus?
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top