I Exchange symmetry of two particles on a sphere

Siupa
Messages
30
Reaction score
5
Consider a system of two identical spin zero particles on a sphere. Let ##\vec{L} = \vec{L}_1 + \vec{L}_2## be the total orbital angular momentum of the two particles, and ##l_1, l_2## be the orbital angular momentum quantum numbers corresponding to particle 1 and particle 2.

Consider the simultaneous eigenstates of ##L^2, L_z## with ##l_1 + l_2 = 1##.

Are these states symmetric or anti-symmetric under particle exchange?

Now, the combined angular momentum quantum number for these states is ##L = 1##.

On one hand, ##(-1)^L## would tell me that they're antisimmetric for ##L = 1## (although this actually refers to parity, not particle exchange. But often these are related)

On the other hand, the symmetry properties of Clebsch-Gordan coefficients would tell me that any state in the highest weight tuple is always symmetric under particles exchange, by ##(-1)^{j_1 + j_2 - J}## with ##j_1 + j_2 = l_1 + l_2 = 1## and ##J = L = 1##.

Which one is the correct approach?

There's a similar question here, but it only deals with the case ##l_1 = l_2##, where the argument from parity and the argument from Clebsch-Gordan agree and give the same symmetry properties. However, in this case we must have ##l_1 \neq l_2##, and this seems to make the two approaches disagree.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The states are defined in terms of the tensor product of the single particle states, $$\mathbf{l}_1\otimes\mathbf{l}_2$$ This space has ##(2l_1+1)(2l_2+1)## vectors. Selecting combinations that are eigenvectors of ##L^2## and ##L_z## is done with the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients. The symmetry under interchange of the two particles is therefore determined by the symmetry of these coefficients. With more than two particles, this symmetry may be mixed.

That said, the symmetry under parity is determined by the interchange of ##x \rightarrow -x## for all particles at once. This should be ##(-)^{l_1}(-)^{l_2}##.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top