B Understanding Excitation Energy in Atoms: Threshold Values and Potential States

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bennet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Excitation
Bennet
My physics textbook says roughly that:

Within an atom; when electrons are raised from the ground state to the energy levels that comprise their various atomic spectra, the potential energy carried by either a photon or an electron (or other) must exactly match these quantitative energy levels to excite the electrons into a raised potential state.

And if the energy of the incident "entity" does not match these critical values then nothing happens at all?

Yet it seems to be the case that to cause Ionisation of the same atom, the specific level of energy can be completely imprecise as long as it meets the requirements of being above a threshold value

Is this the case or have I got the wrong end of the stick?

Many thanks for any help provided. If stupid please be kind as never been on a forum before. Thanks.

(Detailed insight beyond high school level would be greatly appreciated if applicable.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bennet said:
Yet it seems to be the case that to cause Ionisation of the same atom, the specific level of energy can be completely imprecise as long as it meets the requirements of being above a threshold value
I moved your question to the quantum section where I think it will get attention from people who can help with the math. However, what you say here is essentially correct. The energy levels of bound states are quantized, but unbound states are not.
 
thanks
 
Bennet said:
an electron (or other) must exactly match these quantitative energy levels to excite the electrons into a raised potential state.
Photon energy doesn't have to be exactly equal to the energy difference with some excited state for something to happen inside an atom. In general, interaction between atom and EM field causes a disturbance in which different energy eigenfunctions are coupled. It's just that the probability for the atom to end up in a level whose energy difference is closest to the photon energy is higher than those to end up in any other levels.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...
Back
Top