B Exercise for Students: Incorrect Special Relativity Analysis

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter pervect
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exercise students
pervect
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
10,397
Reaction score
1,575
Based on an incorrect understanding of special relativity

a) Pick a problem from a textbook, and come up with a different answer than the textbook does.

Additionally, do one or both of the following:

b1) Argue that the textbook answer is wrong and you are right

b2) Argue that there is an inconsistency in your solution, and use this inconsistency to demonstrate that "special relativity is bunk".

Extra credit is awarded if the textbook has a typo, and actually IS wrong.
 
  • Like
Likes Herman Trivilino
Physics news on Phys.org
...but, please, don't post it here on PF! :biggrin:
 
vanhees71 said:
...but, please, don't post it here on PF! :biggrin:

I think posting it on April 1 would have been OK. Which makes it too late for any entries this year.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
pervect said:
I think posting it on April 1 would have been OK. Which makes it too late for any entries this year.
In the time zone where I live, you began this thread on 2 April, which was already too late! (The dangers of different observers sychronising their clocks differently!)
 
  • Like
Likes Imager and vanhees71
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top