Expansion around a classical vacuum

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of expanding a quantum field theory (QFT) around a classical vacuum and considering small fluctuations in that context. Participants explore the implications of integrating over all field configurations in path integrals and the nature of perturbative expansions in relation to field values.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the distinction between "expanding the theory around a classical vacuum" and "considering small fluctuations," questioning why small fluctuations are required when integrating over all field configurations.
  • Another participant clarifies that while all field values are integrated, the notion of small fluctuations refers to specific physical values, particularly in the context of vacuum-to-vacuum transitions where boundary values are zero.
  • A different participant raises a concern about the formal nature of the methods used to compute these integrals, suggesting that without a solid understanding of the computational techniques, the discussion may lack clarity.
  • One participant draws an analogy to the method of stationary phase in ordinary integrals, explaining that one finds stationary points and approximates the integral as a Gaussian around those points, linking this to the treatment of fluctuations in QFT.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that all field configurations are integrated over in path integrals, but there is no consensus on the implications of small fluctuations or the necessity of expanding around a classical vacuum. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the deeper understanding of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about field configurations and the dependence on specific definitions of small fluctuations. The mathematical steps involved in evaluating the integrals are also noted as potentially unresolved.

GargleBlast42
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I have a severe confusion about the notions of "expanding the theory around a classical vacuum" and "considering small fluctuations around a classical vacuum" which I find in QFT textbooks.

My problem is: in the path integral \int D\phi e^{i S[\phi]} one doesn't integrate only over field configurations close to the vacuum, but over all field configurations. And when one is considering a perturbative expansion, this expansion is in the coupling constant (like \lambda in \phi^4 theory), but one doesn't assume \phi to be small, or am I wrong?

So the questions would be: Why does one require the field configurations to be small fluctuations around a classical vacuum? And what would happen if I was expanding the theory about a field configuration that is not a classical vacuum (except that the mass could be possibly negative)? The first question is more important for me.

I would be very grateful for any clarification.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry for bumping this, but I would be really happy about any input.
 
You are right that one integrates over all values of fields, not only the small ones. The assertion that field is small means something else. It refers to a physical value of field, such as the boundary value appearing in the definition of the path integral. In particular, if you calculate the vacuum-to-vacuum transition, then the boundary values of the field are zero, which, of course, are small.
 
Last edited:
Do you have any idea how to actually compute these integrals? If not, I'm afraid that the answer won't make sense --- the entire apparatus is rather formal, which is to say, it is a series of methods to circumvent the problem that evaluating these integrals exactly is impossible.
 
There is a strong analogy with evaluating an ordinary integral of this type by the method of stationary phase. One first finds the point(s) of stationary phase, and then approximates the integral as a gaussian (which equates to treating the fluctuations as "small" in some formal sense) around each such point. Corrections to the gaussian correspond to doing perturbation theory in QFT.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K