So, I was doing a question on Laurent series. Part of it asked me to work out the pole of the function:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

$$ exp \bigg[\frac{1}{z-1}\bigg]$$

The answer is ##1## - since, we can write out a Maclaurin expansion:

(1) $$ exp\bigg[\frac{1}{z-1}\bigg] = 1+\frac{1}{z-1}+\frac{1}{2!}\frac{1}{(z-1)^{2}} $$

But, I can't actually justify this expansion -surely if we have an expression like ##exp(f(x))##, then the expansion should be:

(2) $$ exp\bigg[f(x)\bigg] = exp[f(0)]+f'(0)exp[f(0)]x+ \ldots $$

Which definitely doesn't agree with the result stated in (1). Why is this?

Thanks!!

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I Expansion of ## e^{f(x)} ##

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Expansion e^{f | Date |
---|---|

I Which x_0 to use in a Taylor series expansion? | Feb 19, 2018 |

B Irrational inequalities √f(x)>g(x) and √f(x)>g(x) | Jan 18, 2018 |

A Newton's Generalized Binomial Theorem | Sep 29, 2017 |

B Expressions of ##log(a+b), tan^{-1}(a+b),sin^{-1}(a+b)##,etc | Feb 20, 2017 |

A I need some help with the derivation of fourth order Runge Kutta | Jan 27, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**