Expansion of Electromagnetic waves

AI Thread Summary
Electromagnetic waves can expand infinitely in a vacuum and carry energy despite the electric and magnetic fields varying inversely with the square of the distance. This is because while the energy per unit area decreases according to the inverse square law, the fields themselves are part of a dynamic configuration that propagates at the speed of light. The energy carried by the waves is distributed over an expanding area, leading to a linear drop in field amplitude rather than an inverse square drop. Thus, the fundamental nature of electromagnetic waves allows them to sustain energy transfer even as they expand. Understanding this distinction clarifies how electromagnetic waves function in space.
Feynmanfan
Messages
128
Reaction score
0
Hi there Physics masters!

How on Earth do electromagnetic waves expand at the speed of light to infinity (in vacuum) if we've learned that the electric and magnetic fields vary inversely proportional to the square of the distance?

I don't know if it's a stupid question but I'm quite baffled about it.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I do not understand what your problem is? Could you please elaborate?
 
Certainly.

Well, as in my first electromagnetism course I've learned that the electric field and magnetic field are both inversely propotional to the square of the distance.

Now, electromagnetic waves can expand infinetely in space and can carry ENERGy (that's what I felt today at the beach, the sun was burning!). SO my question is, how is it that these waves can carry energy and can expand to infinity in vacuum if the fields that create them vary inversely proportional to the square of the distance.

I'm a first year physics student so if you think this question has no sense just tell me and I'll think about something else.
 
Feynmanfan said:
How on Earth do electromagnetic waves expand at the speed of light to infinity (in vacuum) if we've learned that the electric and magnetic fields vary inversely proportional to the square of the distance?

Electrostatic fields of a point charge are inverse-square.
This is one configuration of the electromagnetic field.

A plane electromagnetic wave is a different configuration of the electromagnetic field.
This configuration involves a dynamical electric field and a dynamical magnetic field, which sustain each other and propagate disturbances at the speed of light.
 
Feynmanfan said:
Now, electromagnetic waves can expand infinetely in space and can carry ENERGy (that's what I felt today at the beach, the sun was burning!). SO my question is, how is it that these waves can carry energy and can expand to infinity in vacuum if the fields that create them vary inversely proportional to the square of the distance.
I'm a little puzzled that you are puzzled! :wink:

It is certainly possible for EM waves to be emitted from a "point" source and expand outward, carrying energy. Since the wave covers the entire area of an expanding sphere, wouldn't you think that its energy is also spread out in an inverse square pattern?

Note that it's the energy per unit area that drops off according to an inverse square law, not the field itself. The energy per unit area carried by the field is reflected by the size of the field squared--so the amplitude of the field actually drops off linearly. Does that make some sense?
 
Last edited:
Thanks.

Now I understand
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top