Expansion with Pascal Triangle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around expanding the expression (1+x+x^2)^5 using a method similar to Pascal's Triangle. Participants suggest substituting y for (1+x) to simplify the expansion process and recommend using the multinomial theorem for handling trinomials. A member shares insights from a tutorial where their professor applied Pascal's Triangle to expand (a+b)^5, demonstrating the method effectively. Additionally, hints are provided for manually expanding smaller values of n and adjusting the triangle's structure to accommodate three terms. The conversation emphasizes collaborative problem-solving and the exploration of various mathematical techniques.
Icetray
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

At a real loss here. I have a question that requires me to expend (1+x+x2)5 by constructing a pattern similar to that of the "Pascal Triangle". I understand the Pascal Triangle and know how to use with with expansions of two terms only (i.e. just (1+x)5)

Again, I have really have no clue how to get started and would really appreciate any hints that you guys can provide. (I would really like to solve this myself if possible (: )

Thanks guys!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try substituting y at the the place of (1+x). :)
 
Pranav-Arora said:
Try substituting y at the the place of (1+x). :)

Thanks for you speedy reply! (: Anyway do you mean expend (y+x2)5 instead? Would that not mean that when I re-substitute y = 1+x into the answer, I'll have more expansions to carry out?

Thanks again!
 
Yes, and after you have done that you will have, of course, terms of y up to y^5 so you will need to use Pascal's triangle to exand each power of y= 1+ x.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Yes, and after you have done that you will have, of course, terms of y up to y^5 so you will need to use Pascal's triangle to exand each power of y= 1+ x.

Alright! I'll go and try it out. (: Thanks for the help Pranav-Arora and HallsofIvy! Much appriciated! (:
 
Icetray said:
Alright! I'll go and try it out. (: Thanks for the help Pranav-Arora and HallsofIvy! Much appriciated! (:

Don't go that way now, i think i have found a much simpler way for it. (But i am also not able to understand it). Check out the multinomial theorem on Wikipedia:-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multinomial_theorem

I don't understand what does the sigma notation mean here?
 
Pranav-Arora said:
Don't go that way now, i think i have found a much simpler way for it. (But i am also not able to understand it). Check out the multinomial theorem on Wikipedia:-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multinomial_theorem

I don't understand what does the sigma notation mean here?

I was thinking that there might be an easier way as well. All that expending seems like it'll take much effort. And I visited the link that you provided. That's way to complicated. Anyone knows if there's anything on the Pascal Triangle in Thomas' Calculus? I'm currently using that as my reference book.
 
Pranav-Arora said:
But i would recommend you to learn multinomial theorem. I too don't know it so I have started a thread on multinomial theorem, you can follow that to learn it. Link:-
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=3449686#post3449686

Thanks for everything Pranav! (: I look forward to replies on your thread! (: Anyway I realized that for this question, they want us to use a pattern similar to that of the Pascal Triangle. I assume that in this case, substituting y=1+x is the only way? ):
 
  • #10
Since there are three terms (a trinomial), use http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal's_pyramid#Structure_of_the_Tetrahedron".

Added in Edit:

Another idea: (But some of my ideas are half-baked at best.)
Use Pascal's Triangle with the following.

1 + x + x2 = 1 + 2x + x2 - x = (1 + x)2 - x

Therefore, (1 + x + x2)5 = [(1 + x)2 - x]5
= [(1 + x)2]5 + 5[(1 + x)2]4x + 10[(1 + x)2]3x2 + 10[(1 + x)2]2x3 + 5[(1 + x)2]x4 + x5


Yup, still pretty messy !
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
Here are two hints.

First, expand (1 + x + x^2)^n "by hand" for a few small values of n-- say at least n = 1,2,3.

Second, since you are dealing with a trinomial instead of a binomial, expect to add 3 numbers instead of 2 to get each new entry in the triangle.

Here is a start...

Code:
            1
        1   1   1
    1   2   3   2   1
      ...   7   ...
 
  • #12
awkward said:
Here are two hints.

First, expand (1 + x + x^2)^n "by hand" for a few small values of n-- say at least n = 1,2,3.

Second, since you are dealing with a trinomial instead of a binomial, expect to add 3 numbers instead of 2 to get each new entry in the triangle.

Here is a start...

Code:
            1
        1   1   1
    1   2   3   2   1
      ...   7   ...

Hey guys. Just came back from my tutorial. What my professor actually did was what the other members suggested her except that he let 1= a and x+x2=b. From there he used the pascal triangle to expend out (a+b)5. Where he later used the pascal triangle to expend out the remaining factors again. (:

Anyway thank you so much for all your help guys! :D
 
  • #13
awkward said:
Here are two hints.

First, expand (1 + x + x^2)^n "by hand" for a few small values of n-- say at least n = 1,2,3.

Second, since you are dealing with a trinomial instead of a binomial, expect to add 3 numbers instead of 2 to get each new entry in the triangle.

Here is a start...

Code:
            1
        1   1   1
    1   2   3   2   1
      ...   7   ...
awkward has a great idea here.

(Add the number directly above to the number on either side of the number above. Any (missing) number to the left or right of the triangle is taken to be zero.)

Let's complete the 4th row. (It's for (1+x+x2)3.)

Code:
            1
        1   1   1
    1   2   3   2   1
1   3   6   7   6   3   1

So (1+x+x2)3 = 1 + 3x + 6x2 + 7x3 + 6x4 + 3x5 + x6 .
 
  • #14
I think this is answer

1
5 5
10 20 10
10 30 30 10
5 20 30 20 5
1 5 10 10 5 1
 
Back
Top