Expectation of Negative Binomial Distribution

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the expected value of the negative binomial distribution, specifically the differing expressions for E[X]. Participants explore the interpretations of the parameters involved and the implications for the expected value calculation.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that E[X] for the negative binomial distribution is r/p, referencing their proof for the geometric distribution as a basis for this belief.
  • Another participant cites Wikipedia, stating that E[X] is r(1-p)/p, expressing trust in this source for mathematical topics.
  • A third participant claims that both expressions are correct, explaining that they arise from different interpretations of the random variable X: one as the number of failures before achieving r successes, and the other as the number of trials needed to reach r successes.
  • This participant also notes that the definition used by the first participant may be non-standard, clarifying that r typically represents the number of successes rather than the number of trials.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correct expression for E[X], with some supporting r/p and others supporting r(1-p)/p. The discussion highlights multiple interpretations of the negative binomial distribution, indicating that no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved definitions regarding the parameters of the negative binomial distribution, particularly the interpretation of r and the random variable X. The discussion reflects varying conventions in literature.

GregA
Messages
210
Reaction score
0
I am re-writing up some lecture notes and one of the proofs that E[X] for the negative binomial is r/p where r is the number of trials...The problem is there are a number of books that say r(1-p)/p is the correct expectation whilst others agree with 1/p

Which one is correct...for what its worth I have worked through the proof that the expectation for the geometric distribution is 1/p and find it pretty convincing...hence I'm lead to believe that r/p is correct for the negative binomial...I am worried though that a good number of sources differ in opinion however.

Can you folks pitch in please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
wikipedia says r(1-p)/p for E[X] for a Negative Binomial Distribution. I tend to trust it on math topics.

Are you sure you wrote down the proof correctly?
 
Both are correct!

BTW, I think you are using a very non-standard definition. r is almost always the predetermined number of successes that must be reached, not the number of trials.

The reason both are correct is because there are two different interpretations of the random variable X: The number of failures that occur in reaching the r successes, or the number of trials needed to reach r successes. The expected value of the number of failures is r\frac{1-p}{p} while the expected value of the number of trials is \frac r p.
 
Excellent!...thanks for that..by the way I ought to have said successes but it was late when I typed it...again, thanks :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K