I am re-writing up some lecture notes and one of the proofs that E[X] for the negative binomial is r/p where r is the number of trials...The problem is there are a number of books that say r(1-p)/p is the correct expectation whilst others agree with 1/p(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Which one is correct...for what its worth I have worked through the proof that the expectation for the geometric distribution is 1/p and find it pretty convincing...hence I'm lead to believe that r/p is correct for the negative binomial...I am worried though that a good number of sources differ in opinion however.

Can you folks pitch in please?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Expectation of Negative Binomial Distribution

Loading...

Similar Threads - Expectation Negative Binomial | Date |
---|---|

A Value at Risk, Conditional Value at Risk, expected shortfall | Mar 9, 2018 |

I Conditional Expectation Value of Poisson Arrival in Fixed T | Dec 21, 2017 |

I Poisson distribution regarding expected distance | Oct 22, 2017 |

B The expectation value of superimposed probability functions | Sep 9, 2017 |

Expected value and negative binomial distribution | Feb 7, 2009 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**